Coulter column about Christie

She starts out by saying Christie deserves to be defended, then proceeds to show why he shouldn't be.

But it is a good read.  One problem though.  She points out that Christie gave the keynote to the GOP convention in 2012.  Romney probably selected him, or had a big say in selecting him to give that speech.  Coulter disassembles that speech in this piece, which was good.  Trouble is that Coulter supported Romney--- his judgment was questionable in the selection of Christie for this speech.  That implies a reflection upon Coulter's judgment as well.

Christie should be defended because the charges are ridiculous.  Secondly, even though I don't like him, I don't think the left should be able to select the GOP's nominees---neither pro or con.  If the left can get their favorite squish in so much trouble as a governor of a small state over something as Mickey Mouse as this, just think of the kind of trouble he can get into as President.

Hopefully, Christie won't be the GOP nominee.  Hopefully, New Jersey will be stuck with him for the rest of his term.  They don't know how good they've got it.  Even a half-baked Republican is a lot better than a lefty.