Thursday, May 9, 2019

FBI hiding predicate for Russian collusion investigation

Updated,

5.9.19:

After listening to this again, and relating what is happening lately with the obstruction allegations, it is clear that the intelligence community worked with the FBI to make this a criminal matter, when it was, at best, an intelligence matter.  As Bongino points out, the CIA cannot enforce the law.  They can only discuss what they find.

Don't get the idea that this is legit.  We already know that the NSA intercepts were being abused.  This is a proven fact.

They were planning to use the obstruction angle all along.  There was no collusion.  They knew it well before the election.   This was premeditated.  A plan.

5.8.19:

Dan Bongino has an hour long program, and it gets pretty thick with detail.  You have to watch it all the way through to get all of it.  Even then, you may get lost in the weeds with this thing.  Here's a sound bite, if you will, that encapsulates an important point.

We were told that the PapaD disclosure, of the Russians having dirt on Clinton, was the predicate for the investigation.  Bongino states it emphatically that this is not so.  This requires study, and I don't know that I have the inclination for that.

The main reason that I don't think I need to verify this, is that it is so manifestly evident to me that all along, this entire thing was bogus.

Anyway, he has an entire hour of stuff here.  He also cites a John Solomon piece at the Hill.  I include an embedded tweet to that article if you wish to read it.






No comments: