That seems to be the drift of this article by the New York Times.
No worries, they seem to be saying to themselves.
What about that question, then? I will try to answer it.
For one thing, it isn't about what they say it is about. Never is. The Democrats say it is about race. If it was a "racist" thing, then why are white "educated" types willing to vote for Hillary? My thought is that education doesn't necessarily equate with intelligence. The "white trash" are just dumb and bigoted, they seem to say. Dumb and bigoted is just so yesterday. So, it is more of a class thing. Those of the so called upper crust can look down on the ignorant white rednecks and say "tut tut".
Also, I note the big money punditry tended to keep mum on the Gold Star flap. But why? It isn't because of the facts of the matter. But the facts don't matter either. The facts of the matter is that the Khan fellow wrote about Sharia. Even the left wing pundits admit to that. Okay, then why can't we discuss that? Oh, but you cannot criticize the Gold Star parents, even though the Democrats do. Heck, when did the Democrats begin to care so much about vets? When they spat upon Vietnam Vets? No, it isn't about facts.
If the pundits are all quiet on the Sharia front, then why are they keeping quiet? I have a theory. MONEY. If they support Trump, then they lose money. Money matters more to them than their own country. It isn't about vets. It isn't about facts. It is isn't about race. It's all about the money.
I support Trump and oppose his critics because basically Trump's critics are full of shit.
But I guess that's my redneck white trash side talking.
No comments:
Post a Comment