Is the Constitution merely a guideline to be consulted by those it purports to regulate, or is it really the supreme law of the land?
It is amazing to me that such a question can even be asked. It is like asking if the sky is blue or is the grass green. The Constitution says explicitly that it is the supreme law of the land. Sure, it is a rhetorical question, but isn't it strange that it has to be asked at all?
Obama can't legally rewrite Federal Law. But he can if nobody will stop him.
That's what elections are for. But even a determined dictator like Mugabe will disregard an election that doesn't go his way.
Now think about that one for awhile. Has it really come to this in the USA?
No comments:
Post a Comment