4/16/24:
FIB will launch an investigation
The ship struck the bridge in a manner in which the force would do the most damage, in my opinion. This is why I am suspicious. It couldn't have been random. The odds are against that happening.
The FIB has not distinguished itself in recent years. This may be considered snark, but it is a reasonable suspicion given their track record. No investigation will be allowed that will show the government in a bad light. It will be politically motivated. Consequently, it cannot be trusted to be accurate nor complete. It will be a white wash.
end update of the post of 3/27/24:
This reminds me of 2001, prior to the 9-11 attack. Two separate occasions when the 610 bridge over Houston Ship Channel was hit. Didn't happen before, and hasn't happened since ( to my knowledge).
I'd say definitely lower than 50-50 probably of an innocent explanation for this. The odds of it randomly turning that way right into the path of a collision? Nah!
LOGAN: Bridge Collapse Was An “Absolutely Brilliant Strategic Attack” https://t.co/E3o97Par7v #Push via @DailyNoahNews Comment: Sped up video looks suspicious to me.
— BootsandOil (@BootsandO6892) March 27, 2024
No comments:
Post a Comment