Monday, May 13, 2024

January 6th 2021 was not a coup

5/13/24:

8:55 AM

I might add that I've always thought, from the very beginning, that January 6th was a false flag. Indeed, this wasn't a coup engineered by Trump, but rather a coup engineered by Pelosi and her fellow Democrats.

I might add also that she has had plenty of support from many in the GOP, including the infamous Liz Cheney. Pelosi lost her bid here, in the USA, and is now peddling her story in Europe, it seems. Just one vote in the Senate stopped a full scale coup by the Democrats. They wanted to ensure their full and complete grip upon power by instituting it into law, but Senator Manchin opposed it. We were that close to losing it all.

If they had succeeded with that, there would no longer be any alternative to the Democrats. How then is that Democracy? Democracy is a choice, not the prohibition against choice. The Democrats sought a prohibition against choice. They aren't protecting Democracy, they are protecting their own interests in holding on to power. They want to hold on to power forever. That almost happened. It still could.

end update of 8:19 am post: 8:19 AM: There's was a debate which included the former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, in which there were portions which she discussed how January 6th 2021 was an "insurrection", and that it was Trump's fault. There are those who commmented upon it based upon other things than what I will comment upon.

For a discussion of that, go to the link indicated above. I will return to the comment she made about January 6th being an insurrection.

First of all, I've posted quite a bit about privacy issues lately. Our cell phones are spying devices that can be used against us. Most folks do not seem to consider that to be a problem. Shall I speculate a bit? Would it be fair that many of those who were arrested and tried for a felony crime on that day, were tracked using data supplied by their own cell phones?

If you accept that much as true, and perhaps you should, since the juries who voted to convict seemed to be accepting it; then what kind of insurrectionists are these? They must not be very sophisticated, eh? Wouldn't it have been better planning and executing to have kept their identities unknown, just in case their nefarious deeds may be traced back to themselves? For example, the Antifa mob wears masks, do they not? Perhaps they also do not keep their phones with them. Or their phones aren't being used against them the way the Jan 6th people were.

Something really doesn't add up. If there's such an information imbalance in favor of the government, then how is it that the Democrat Speaker was caught unaware of these alleged insurrectionists? The participants in the "insurrection" had spying devices implanted on their very persons. Nancy and Co. knew their whereabouts, and perhaps even their intentions. But did the "insurrectionists" know that they were being watched?

Of course I'm insinuating that the government knew all they needed to know beforehand. They could have stopped anything from happening, but instead ALLOWED IT TO HAPPEN. Also, they may well have PARTICPATED in it, so as to INSTIGATE it themselves, for the purposes of casting blame for its occurrence upon those who showed up that day.

If you reject this, then why? The government HAD to know what was going on. The "insurrectionists" were at a disadvantage because they certainly didn't know that they could end up in jail for their troubles. This alone should cast suspicion upon the government for setting this up for their own benefit. After all, cui bono? Who benefited and who didn't? Who has consistently tried to exploit this for political advantage? Why is it so hard to see how they might well have wanted this to happen so that they could use it for their own advantage? January 6th was a set up. Pelosi is a liar, or she is unbelievably ignorant of what her own government is doing.

end update of 1/25/24 post:, 1/25/24:

Glenn Greenwald explains why.

By the way, this video covers a segment of Zero Hedge's recent lengthy video of January 6th.

Also, would anybody care to study this as an example of projection as a propaganda device?

If abandoning Judeo-Christian ethics is a problem, then look in the mirror FIRST. Make sure that you're not engaging in confirmation bias. You're not jumping to conclusions, and you're not mind-reading. Am I self-aware enough to discover these as biases of my own? If so, what to do about it?

Once those questions are answered properly, then let's go forward with analyzing this guy in this video who claims it was a coup, and what are his errors? Glenn Greenwald does that, so let's look at Greenwald's analysis and see if this was correct, and then proceed to determine if it was projection.

It is probably not entirely correct for me to jump a step or two, but for the sake of this post, let's assume that Greenwald's analysis is absolutely correct. Therefore, does the guy in question KNOW what he is saying is false? For if he does, then this may be a prime example of PROJECTION.

I will leave it at that for now. I can say this, I'd like to BELIEVE that it is true and that it is projection. So maybe I should check the lists to make sure that I'm right. Seems like I have a habit of doing that, or I'd like to believe that I have that habit already. But since self-awareness is often a problem, I will double check.

Why bother? Because we've got a problem, and to do nothing about it is condemning ourselves to failure again and again.











No comments: