Who believes Jennifer Rubin?

Updated,

5.28.19:

Rubin is running interference for this cabal.

Shame on you because you’re an embarrassment to journalism:

—Both Strzok and Page were Senior Executive Service (SES)

—Strzok was a Deputy Assistant Director (who wrote AND approved decision to open Crossfire CI probe)

—Page was Counsel to the Deputy/Acting Director of the FBI https://t.co/Mwteu8VSuX

— Undercover Huber (@JohnWHuber) May 27, 2019

5.27.19:

She describes herself as a conservative.  How can she possibly be a conservative?

Anybody who is conservative should be concerned about the use of spies against political opponents.  Yet, somebody was definitely spying.  Rubin goes after Trump and the administration, but it isn't just Trump and his administration who is saying these things.  Rosemary Collyer found some serious irregularities in the use of the NSA 702 about queries.  This was based upon a finding by Admiral Rogers, who brought this to the attention of the FISA court.

You cannot be a conservative and be okay with those kind of abuses.

Rubin makes this all about Trump, but these abuses took place well before he was elected, and may have begun even before he was a candidate.

These abuses were unlawful, and that is what is being investigated.  If the investigation shows the details of how the law was violated and who did it, and it turns out that Trump was correct, then what does Rubin have to say about that?  Is she not for the rule of law, as all good conservatives would be?

Since the law was violated in that 702's case, there is already ample "probable cause" for a full-blown investigation.  More "probable cause" exists for such an investigation than the one supplied as the pretext for the Mueller investigation.  Is Rubin familiar with the Bill of Rights, especially the one about searches and warrants being based upon "probable cause"?  Barr is quite right to be looking into this, and more.

It is hard to see Rubin as anything but a shill for the Democrats.  She is no conservative, and she is no Republican either.  Even a liberal Republican would at least be in support of the party.  She is definitely outside of the party now.  Her purpose at this point is to deceive.  For it is impossible for her to unaware of these basic facts if she had been paying attention at all to what conservative information sources have been saying.  If she's not listening to other conservatives, who does she listen to?