5.29.19:
If Mueller doesn't testify in public, doesn't that imply that his testimony is political? So far, to my knowledge, he has not mentioned sources and methods. That defense won't fly, and a political defense isn't valid.
Besides, Mueller opened the door on this himself. He could have exonerated Trump completely. Yet, the law says you have to prove your case, and it isn't up to Mueller to exonerate. Therefore, the Mueller statement was political in itself, and yet he won't testify because of politics.
5.27.19:
Trust or not trust Mueller! So, if Mueller has all the facts, why isn't he testifying???? Come off it people. Also, if he is not testifying openly, then what does that tell you? You cannot claim to be open, and then hide in the woods.
The following thread is an example of the shallowness of some people, who insist on believing the Mueller/Democrat fairy tales.
This is from the Mueller report, I trust Mueller to have the facts! You may be hearing propaganda! pic.twitter.com/pCPUfsUow4— valentina (@yaldi00) May 24, 2019
thank u for making my point. Gpap was the recipient of a rumor from Mifsud. so WHO did our intel agencies spy on? The foreign nat'l purveyor of that info or the US Citizen who repeated the claim? The fact that they interviewed Mifsud& then let him disappear tells you everything— Michael (@MBlake1771) May 24, 2019
MIFSUD has those EXACT same tangential relationships with WESTERN intelligence too. And as i said, no matter how TANGENTIALLY he's associated with Russia he is still not the "Russian Government" as he's been (laughably) identified.— Michael (@MBlake1771) May 24, 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment