but very slowly
This is evidence that burning fossil fuels is depleting the oxygen in the atmosphere, according to the link. However, we don't have to worry about it making much of a difference in breathability.
No, it does appear that human activity is doing something to the atmosphere, after all. This only puts the question back to where it was when I started in terms of the carbon dioxide increase being attributable to human activity. It doesn't prove anything else.
Al Fin: "Cowboy Commentary", aka "Eat your veggies" The Flag banner is posted in order to defy those who would make patriotic symbols illegal or disreputable.
Monday, September 14, 2015
No wonder the Kennedys were shot
Read this and see why. If someone slapped me like that they had better be ready for a fight.
Update:
Just read Barnhardt's latest. No, I'm not being influenced directly by that in writing this. No, I'm not trying to impress her.
When Pres. Kennedy was shot, my Dad said in response to the news said --- "good". That might sound pretty mean, but the Kennedys weren't universally liked nor admired. I don't think any lefties were worried about the wellbeing of Reagan. As a matter of fact, some government employee did say something about the attempt up on Reagan's life and was fired for saying it. This person sued and won.
I think my emotional state is getting shall we say, a bit challenged by the turn of events these days.
Update:
Just read Barnhardt's latest. No, I'm not being influenced directly by that in writing this. No, I'm not trying to impress her.
When Pres. Kennedy was shot, my Dad said in response to the news said --- "good". That might sound pretty mean, but the Kennedys weren't universally liked nor admired. I don't think any lefties were worried about the wellbeing of Reagan. As a matter of fact, some government employee did say something about the attempt up on Reagan's life and was fired for saying it. This person sued and won.
I think my emotional state is getting shall we say, a bit challenged by the turn of events these days.
These people are stupid and weak
Hungary braces itself for massive surge of up to 30,000 migrants in just ONE DAY from huge Serbian ‘push through’ – as Germany admits it may take in record one million this year.
You can stop this if you wanted to. The failure to stop it is stupid. The fear of what people may think if you did do it, and use extreme measures, is weak.
It's not only "adios, America", it's also adios everybody in the West. What fools.
The so-called "right wing" should rise up and overthrow them if they are that weak. Maybe the so called "right wing" either does not exist, or is so weak itself, it can't nor will do a doggone thing.
You can stop this if you wanted to. The failure to stop it is stupid. The fear of what people may think if you did do it, and use extreme measures, is weak.
It's not only "adios, America", it's also adios everybody in the West. What fools.
The so-called "right wing" should rise up and overthrow them if they are that weak. Maybe the so called "right wing" either does not exist, or is so weak itself, it can't nor will do a doggone thing.
Obligatory, 9/14/15
Yesterday, I noticed a post on Behind The Black, in which the discussion was about the absorption of carbon dioxide in the Southern oceans was higher than thought. I had nothing to comment upon at the moment, but it has developed enough in my mind for me to want to comment now.
Number one, the absorption of carbon dioxide shouldn't be taking place if the Earth is warming. Basic chemistry.
Number two, if the oceans are unexpectedly absorbing carbon dioxide, could it be that their presumptions are wrong?
Three, have any of these people ever decided to check the oxygen levels? I never read about this changing. If the changing in carbon dioxide levels are coming from human activity, it should also show up in the oxygen levels, should it not?
Four, should anyone be impressed with all the money and expertise going into climate research? What if they are barking up the wrong tree, so to speak? Shouldn't they be researching why there were ice ages and warming periods as opposed to jumping to the conclusion that humans are changing the climate? Maybe the climate can change without our help, and our actions are really not that significant in terms of changing the climate. After all, the climate changed without our help for eons before we showed up.
Number one, the absorption of carbon dioxide shouldn't be taking place if the Earth is warming. Basic chemistry.
Number two, if the oceans are unexpectedly absorbing carbon dioxide, could it be that their presumptions are wrong?
Three, have any of these people ever decided to check the oxygen levels? I never read about this changing. If the changing in carbon dioxide levels are coming from human activity, it should also show up in the oxygen levels, should it not?
Four, should anyone be impressed with all the money and expertise going into climate research? What if they are barking up the wrong tree, so to speak? Shouldn't they be researching why there were ice ages and warming periods as opposed to jumping to the conclusion that humans are changing the climate? Maybe the climate can change without our help, and our actions are really not that significant in terms of changing the climate. After all, the climate changed without our help for eons before we showed up.
Sunday, September 13, 2015
Another perspective on Iran nuke deal
American Thinker
It is in the interests of each party, as opposed to the interests of the country:
Update:
It reminds me of how the Roman Empire fell. Nobody cared about the Empire, only about their own interests. If nobody takes care of a thing, it goes away.
Bush the Elder said that he increased taxes in the early 90's not because of his own interests, but the interests of the country. So, it looks like statesmanship is punished and politics is rewarded. If Rush really cared about statesmanship, where was he in 1992 on those tax increases, which he opposed?
Not necessarily mentioned in order to defend the Bushes, who have shown the tendency to divide their own caucus against itself, though. Only that there's plenty of blame to spread around.
Update:
If the "warfare state", as it is described, needs national security voters, then why would they think that they deserve those votes after giving in so easily to the Democrats? In other words, why should these voters be taken for granted? Also, why should those who care about national security give these people their confidence after a fiasco like this?
It is in the interests of each party, as opposed to the interests of the country:
The welfare state requires a dependent underclass. The warfare state requires a feared enemy.The Dems want the immigrant voters and the GOP wants the national security voters, it is theorized.
Update:
It reminds me of how the Roman Empire fell. Nobody cared about the Empire, only about their own interests. If nobody takes care of a thing, it goes away.
Bush the Elder said that he increased taxes in the early 90's not because of his own interests, but the interests of the country. So, it looks like statesmanship is punished and politics is rewarded. If Rush really cared about statesmanship, where was he in 1992 on those tax increases, which he opposed?
Not necessarily mentioned in order to defend the Bushes, who have shown the tendency to divide their own caucus against itself, though. Only that there's plenty of blame to spread around.
Update:
If the "warfare state", as it is described, needs national security voters, then why would they think that they deserve those votes after giving in so easily to the Democrats? In other words, why should these voters be taken for granted? Also, why should those who care about national security give these people their confidence after a fiasco like this?
Inexplicable? Not hardly
Once again, I turn to the Limbaugh show, where he complains about how the leadership has lost its patriotism, and how the Iran "treaty" passage is "inexplicable".
But Limbaugh explained it himself in his second book, See, I told you so. He described Gramscii in that book, so he is fully aware ( or should be ) of what the left is up to. It is nothing other than propaganda, which is to control the minds of the population, meaning US. The control has made it through the ranks, and may well include, in some cases, none other than El Rushbo himself.
In order to demonstrate through art what the left is doing, let's turn again to Brave New World. In particular, that part of the movie in which the Savage is made to look ridiculous. There is a counterpart to that in the real world. It is the movie made by the comedian Bill Maher, which is titled Religuous. Just as the filmmaker character in Brave New World makes the savage character look ridiculous, Maher makes religion look ridiculous, all to the approval of the "controllers" or our own Brave New World.
Hence, people are led to believe in AGW, but not in Christianity. Maher throws in the other religions as well, but the one about Christianity is the real target.
Thus, it is quite easy to explain what has happened, as Limbaugh described himself in his second book. The left has hijacked our culture and is turning it into what they want it to be. They are succeeding tremendously well, just as the hijackers did on 9-11. How this can be a mystery to Limbaugh as to how and why this happened is a mystery in itself.
But Limbaugh explained it himself in his second book, See, I told you so. He described Gramscii in that book, so he is fully aware ( or should be ) of what the left is up to. It is nothing other than propaganda, which is to control the minds of the population, meaning US. The control has made it through the ranks, and may well include, in some cases, none other than El Rushbo himself.
In order to demonstrate through art what the left is doing, let's turn again to Brave New World. In particular, that part of the movie in which the Savage is made to look ridiculous. There is a counterpart to that in the real world. It is the movie made by the comedian Bill Maher, which is titled Religuous. Just as the filmmaker character in Brave New World makes the savage character look ridiculous, Maher makes religion look ridiculous, all to the approval of the "controllers" or our own Brave New World.
Hence, people are led to believe in AGW, but not in Christianity. Maher throws in the other religions as well, but the one about Christianity is the real target.
Thus, it is quite easy to explain what has happened, as Limbaugh described himself in his second book. The left has hijacked our culture and is turning it into what they want it to be. They are succeeding tremendously well, just as the hijackers did on 9-11. How this can be a mystery to Limbaugh as to how and why this happened is a mystery in itself.
Who are the "Oath Keepers"?
There's a writeup in the Christian Science Monitor (CSM) about the group. Upon reading it, I am understand the very strong impression that the editorial staff strongly disapproves of the group.
That doesn't leave a good impression on me about the CSM. They quote the SPLC, which is like quoting Satan about what the truth is on any subject. The SPLC are a bunch of friggin' commie pinkos.
So, who are the CSMers? Looks to me like a bunch of kooks.
I would join up if I could. But I don't appear to be qualified.
There was a book mentioned "Mindwar". This may warrant a closer look. A look at the link leaves the impression that it isn't the same thing or the same person mentioned by CSM. Mindwar is available on Kindle for free, it appears.
The book appears to be right on target with what is being practiced on us by the MSM and their bosses, the Democrat Establishment, along with their flunkies, the Republican Establishment. In other words, it is an appropriate response, which of course explains the SPLC's reaction.
Update:
I just read something on a leftist site on the subject of the Oath Keepers. It is rather amazing how the left is demonizing them. What is even more amazing is that they quoted the guy verbatim, or it seems, not even bother to correct him, and what he says appears to be 100% straight arrow stuff. Yet the leftists pretend to be horrified by them!!! wtf
Update:
I'm digging further into this, and what strikes me once again is how the left accuses others of what they do themselves. The leftists are accusing Oath Keepers of being into Mindwar, which is a book about military psyops. Actually, from what I've reading of the Mindwar text so far, is that it is being practiced upon the American people by the left themselves. This goes back to a paper written by Gramscii many, many years ago. It's basically about how the communists can subvert a society and overthrow it without having to fire a shot. That's precisely what the left is doing this very day. Black helicopter stuff? Maybe, but it is out there, and has been out there for a long time. Nothing really new, here.
That doesn't leave a good impression on me about the CSM. They quote the SPLC, which is like quoting Satan about what the truth is on any subject. The SPLC are a bunch of friggin' commie pinkos.
So, who are the CSMers? Looks to me like a bunch of kooks.
I would join up if I could. But I don't appear to be qualified.
There was a book mentioned "Mindwar". This may warrant a closer look. A look at the link leaves the impression that it isn't the same thing or the same person mentioned by CSM. Mindwar is available on Kindle for free, it appears.
The book appears to be right on target with what is being practiced on us by the MSM and their bosses, the Democrat Establishment, along with their flunkies, the Republican Establishment. In other words, it is an appropriate response, which of course explains the SPLC's reaction.
Update:
I just read something on a leftist site on the subject of the Oath Keepers. It is rather amazing how the left is demonizing them. What is even more amazing is that they quoted the guy verbatim, or it seems, not even bother to correct him, and what he says appears to be 100% straight arrow stuff. Yet the leftists pretend to be horrified by them!!! wtf
Update:
I'm digging further into this, and what strikes me once again is how the left accuses others of what they do themselves. The leftists are accusing Oath Keepers of being into Mindwar, which is a book about military psyops. Actually, from what I've reading of the Mindwar text so far, is that it is being practiced upon the American people by the left themselves. This goes back to a paper written by Gramscii many, many years ago. It's basically about how the communists can subvert a society and overthrow it without having to fire a shot. That's precisely what the left is doing this very day. Black helicopter stuff? Maybe, but it is out there, and has been out there for a long time. Nothing really new, here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)