1/2/24: Update to yesterday's post:
Who is Jamie Raskin, and what kind of people elect him? Here's what Wikipedia had to say about Raskin.
He is a representative in suburban Washington DC, from what I gathered. Washington DC is heavily Democratic, with over 90% of the votes going to Democrats. Even during Ronald Reagan's 49 state landslide in 1984, Washington DC went with the Democrats.
He seems to have come from the so-called "elite" brand. This so-called elite brand seems fixated on what could be called victimology. What is that? According to this type of thinking, there are oppressors and the oppressed. Obviously, he connects to those that he considers victims.
In a period of US History that encompossed such injustices as slavery and Jim Crow, this was not such a bad thing. But the pendulum has swung so wildly that these people are becoming the new oppressors themselves. Ronald Reagan called the Soviet Union the "evil empire". That's because the communists are a group of people that do not share the Judeo-Christian ethical system. Indeed, the communists persecute people of faith. It would seem that these people are pursuing the notion that this Judeo-Christian ethic is oppressive. If so, to whom? The communists themselves?
A study of history would disprove the claim of Christian oppression. People of faith led the fight against slavery. People of faith are the conscience of the nation, which is what the communists are so bereft of. Why should anyone trust such people as communists, who have no moral sense whatsoever, and whose basic motivation is to maximize their own power over the people that they rule with an iron fist? What could be more clear that these people have crossed a line, and have become what we used to think of as an enemy--totalitarian communism.
To put it shortly, Washington DC is completely out of control. A small group of people want to rule over a nation, if not the entire world itself. They claim to be democratic, but they are in fact no different than any tyrant that has ever gotten control over a civilization. They do not bring democracy, indeed they are indifferent to it at best, and hostile to it at worst.
end update, the original post follows below:
Raskin is attempting to intimidate the court. He has demanded that Judge Thomas recuse himself. I think the court had better be a lot firmer than what they've been so far.
The ball game folks: Dems want to destroy the Supreme Court.
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) December 31, 2023
Dem Rep. Jamie Raskin says Justice Clarence Thomas "absolutely should recuse himself" from decisions on Trump's ballot access, saying "the question is, what do we do if he doesn't?" pic.twitter.com/1UHoiPL89O
Julie Kelly's Commentary:
Julie Kelly Commentary: Lower Courts Dare SCOTUS to Act with Lawless Rulings, But Will They? https://t.co/528QaOpAH3
— BootsandOil (@BootsandO6892) January 1, 2024
No comments:
Post a Comment