Monday, August 27, 2018

Digital valves to replace camshafts?

Updated,

8.27.18:

I have studied upon the issues discussed here, and for me, the primary issue is reliability.  The more complex something is, the greater the chance of failure.  The problem with this design is its complexity.  If it doesn't work, it isn't much good for anything.

Simplify, simplify, simplify.


Originally posted on 8.26.18:

A bit of grease monkey stuff here.  Engines are interesting to me, and these are no exception.

The idea here is to time valves to fit what the engine needs at various times.  A mechanical valve set up does not have this kind of capability.  Very high tech ICE engines as opposed to all electrical as an option for future.







Sunday, August 26, 2018

Inside the Democrats' Café California


Clarice's pieces.

She sums up nicely:

"Bummer.  Well, we have a policy advantage, don't we?  Higher taxes, bigger federal government, anti-energy production, open borders, anti-Semite, anti-Christian, anti-male, anti-white, pro-Palestinian, pro-Antifa, pro-MS-13,support for unfair trade policies, anti-military, anti-law-enforcement," said someone out of eyesight who seemed to be sniffling.  "Maybe we should try selling crazy to another group of voters – American voters seem full up on ours."





"Cafe California" is a reference to Hotel California, the song by the Eagles.

'Relax', said the night man,
We are programmed to receive.
You can checkout any time you like,
But you can never leave!

Watch the video and get the lyrics. Available via https://t.co/OnW8XMwSm3. https://t.co/hAcejNjrRe


Batman movie scene

What a laugh!  How does he do it?




Can Trump pardon himself?

There are those claiming that he can't.  But there's nothing in the Constitution that prevents it.  Only thing that has a firewall to it is in the one exception of impeachment.  The president is expressly powerless to pardon himself from impeachment and removal from office.

Aside from that, there's nothing in the Constitution that prevents him from issuing a blanket pardon for himself, and pardoning anybody else he pleases.

If a president pardoned everybody, including himself, he would have a PR problem.  He would look guilty.  In order to escape his accusers, he would have to resort to this unprecedented move.

But Trump's case may be justifiable.  This entire "investigation" was phony from the start.  It is an excuse to remove the president from office.  His accusers are only looking for this very excuse.

By the way, it has also been said that impeachment is a political act.  The thing to remember here is that the legal process is being politicized.  The president's critics want to appear to be legal in removing the president.  By pardoning himself and his associates, Trump can take that out of his critics hands.  But in doing so, he will have given them ammunition to remove him from power for purely political reasons.  This escapes the phony show trial aspect, but it doesn't remove his risk of being removed from office.  In other words, by disarming his legal accusers, he would arm his political ones.

All of it, pardons and impeachment, would be legal.  After blanket pardons, it would become completely political.  Furthermore, it would be better because it would put things on their proper foundation.  This legal show trial game is part of a political campaign.  Of course, Trump's critics will scream bloody murder, but they have been doing that already.



Saturday, August 25, 2018

Don Surber: Mueller the blackmailer

Don Surber: Mueller the blackmailer: I underestimated Bob Mueller. I thought he was just an incompetent whose career is best known for botching the anthrax case after 9/11. He i...

comment:

More of the Civil War talk that isn't. 


Now America is engaged in a civil war. The Marxists bet that if they bring President Trump down, we won't fight back, that we will just quit politics and get on with our lives.

Unless you organize, they will be no threat of war.  If there is no threat of war, the perpetrators have no reason to believe that there will be accountability.

The "war" is only metaphorical.  It is a political struggle.  Not a war.

If your "lives depended" on it, then act like it.  Otherwise, it is more fakery.  Puffed up words.  If the Marxists are betting the way Surber says here, then they will win.


Bill of Attainder

Basically, it is the legislature declaring somebody guilty without the benefit of a trial.

Someone on the following link, (a blog )commented that the Trump situation is almost like one of these bills.

But no law has been passed.  There is no "bill".  However, there are a lot of threats of impeachment if Trump were to do this or that.  For example, Sen. Graham said that if Trump fired Mueller, it would be the beginning of the end of his presidency.  This past week, Sen. Schumer threatened Trump not
to pardon Manafort or Cohen.

It really does seem to be the case that the ruling class has unofficially declared Trump to be illegal, and is looking to try to make this seem legal so as to maintain the appearance of rule of law.

It isn't just the Democrats.  There are those on the GOP side that will not allow Trump to do his job.


Friday, August 24, 2018

It's about politics, not rule of law

Dick Morris is hedging his bets here.  He says "will backfire", but at the end of his essay, he switches to "may". So, which is it?

The fact is, we won't know until the elections.

Here's my opinion, for what it is worth.  Trump and his associates would not be in trouble at all except for the fact that Trump won the election in 2016.  Therefore, everything here is about politics, not rule of law.

Manafort would not have been convicted.  There would have been no trial.  We know that already because his case is ten years old.  Everybody in DC knew Manafort.  Nobody thought he was a crook, otherwise he'd a been in jail already.  His sin was to be associated with Trump.  Same goes with all the rest who have been coerced into pleading guilty in exchange for cooperation in getting Trump.

That's the bottom line.  Getting Trump.  It is not about rule of law.  It is about politics.