Sex Orgies, prostitution, porn: Allegations shake Catholic Church in Italy
According to the media, the "Pope" is blameless. It is his faithless flock that is to blame. Do you recognize the pattern? Did we not have the same with Barak Hussein Obama? Obama could never do wrong their eyes. Whatever went wrong was always somebody else's fault. If you ever said anything, you were called a "racist".
Notice however, how these people turn back to tradition and blame the man on top when a GOP guy is in the White House.
The media has become nothing but a group of political hacks hellbent on destruction of this country. Maybe something can be done about them. Something needs to be done about them.
This "Pope", from what I can hear, is probably egging this stuff on. Instead, the media won't report it that way. No, to them, this "Pope" is really "strict", with high standards. That is most likely a load of BS.
Stuff like this is what makes me wonder how intelligent people can fall for what these people say.
Whether it is "climate science" or this, just about everything coming from them reeks of falsehood.
Al Fin: "Cowboy Commentary", aka "Eat your veggies" The Flag banner is posted in order to defy those who would make patriotic symbols illegal or disreputable.
Friday, March 10, 2017
Thursday, March 9, 2017
This amazes me when I see it
From Instapundit, Disney boss says there's no media bias. This leads me to believe that there some cognitive deficiency that prevents these people to recognize how they are behaving against any kind of standard.
If you look objectively at the situation at all, you have to conclude that there is bias. A person cannot help but biased in terms of their own point of view. To deny this is to claim that you have no point of view at all, or that you don't care about anything at all.
For instance, these people tend to favor AGW theory. So, if you believe that to be true, how can you be objective about it? Once a thing becomes emotionalized, reason leaves the picture. If they were objective about it, they could listen to "climate sceptics". Instead, they want to shut them up. That ain't being objective, ya'll. Don't tell me you are objective about it when it is an article of faith for you. It like asking a Christian if he believes that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. It is an article of faith. If the Christian truly believes it, he's not going to objectively listen to arguments against it. Reason has left that arena. You believe in what you believe, or you don't. But AGW isn't supposed to be religion. It is supposed to be science, and should not have anything to do with emotions.
Science is about logic, reason, and evidence. It isn't about how you feel about it.
So, when one of them says that he isn't being biased, you have to wonder if there's something not working right upstairs. It is a cognitive deficit. Or that they are lying through their teeth. It is really tempting for me to believe that they are lying. At times, it starts to piss me off a bit.
So, I am amazed when a seemingly intelligent person could say something completely ludicrous as saying that there is no media bias. It is like, do you think I am stupid or something?
If you look objectively at the situation at all, you have to conclude that there is bias. A person cannot help but biased in terms of their own point of view. To deny this is to claim that you have no point of view at all, or that you don't care about anything at all.
For instance, these people tend to favor AGW theory. So, if you believe that to be true, how can you be objective about it? Once a thing becomes emotionalized, reason leaves the picture. If they were objective about it, they could listen to "climate sceptics". Instead, they want to shut them up. That ain't being objective, ya'll. Don't tell me you are objective about it when it is an article of faith for you. It like asking a Christian if he believes that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. It is an article of faith. If the Christian truly believes it, he's not going to objectively listen to arguments against it. Reason has left that arena. You believe in what you believe, or you don't. But AGW isn't supposed to be religion. It is supposed to be science, and should not have anything to do with emotions.
Science is about logic, reason, and evidence. It isn't about how you feel about it.
So, when one of them says that he isn't being biased, you have to wonder if there's something not working right upstairs. It is a cognitive deficit. Or that they are lying through their teeth. It is really tempting for me to believe that they are lying. At times, it starts to piss me off a bit.
So, I am amazed when a seemingly intelligent person could say something completely ludicrous as saying that there is no media bias. It is like, do you think I am stupid or something?
Obligatory, 3.9.17
On the eve of the trip. Leaving to stay overnight with my ride so as to get a better start early tomorrow morn.
Posting will be light in the interim. It should take only a day.
Posting will be light in the interim. It should take only a day.
Wednesday, March 8, 2017
Hysteria over Russia
It's damaging our interests.
The bottom line is that the United States is embroiled in a hysterical reaction to Russian meddling in the Democratic Party that could spill over into far more serious consequences for the United States. Unless politicians and the media want the United States to have little to no leverage against ISIS or on behalf of Syrian refugees, want the United States to provide significant military and economic subsidies for Ukraine to fight Russia, are willing to risk war or proxy war with a nuclear power, and want to avoid peaceful means of improved relationships, they should think about whether pushing conspiracy theories for short-term domestic political gain is such a great idea.
Schumer's Big Lie, by L. Neil Smith
Schumer's Big Lie, by L. Neil Smith
comment:
His big lie is to accuse Trump of what he does himself.
comment:
His big lie is to accuse Trump of what he does himself.
Obligatory, 3.8.17
Today, the concerns were a little closer to home. I will be going to Dallas soon for my first appointment. It has been a long road, but it looks like I am finally going to get there.
If nothing else happens to blow this up, then it will take from six to eight weeks to complete. It won't start immediately, as the first appointment is just a consultation and a cat scan. The treatment will be planned out and once that is in place, then it can begin.
After that, we'll see what's what. I am hoping I feel a whole lot better.
If nothing else happens to blow this up, then it will take from six to eight weeks to complete. It won't start immediately, as the first appointment is just a consultation and a cat scan. The treatment will be planned out and once that is in place, then it can begin.
After that, we'll see what's what. I am hoping I feel a whole lot better.
Tuesday, March 7, 2017
Dick Morris says that there's proof Obama tapped Trump's phone
By the way, his site is getting so commercialized that it is becoming unusable.
He says that an explicit request to tap Trump's phone came down just after the nomination, but was refused. However, in October, they asked again without mentioning Trump. I saw that in another place, so it checks out. Morris went on to say that once someone's is heard on the phone (like Trump), that they can tap their phone too. Get it? They went after Trump indirectly. The point was to get to Trump by way of his associates.
You might have a lawyerly type say that they can get away with that. Well, maybe. However, they are denying that they did it. So, why make the denial?
Something is still rotten in Denmark, ya'll.
He says that an explicit request to tap Trump's phone came down just after the nomination, but was refused. However, in October, they asked again without mentioning Trump. I saw that in another place, so it checks out. Morris went on to say that once someone's is heard on the phone (like Trump), that they can tap their phone too. Get it? They went after Trump indirectly. The point was to get to Trump by way of his associates.
You might have a lawyerly type say that they can get away with that. Well, maybe. However, they are denying that they did it. So, why make the denial?
Something is still rotten in Denmark, ya'll.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)