The thought of moving out west is just way too soon. With the destruction of the shack, and such, much rethinking has had to occur. I am leaning towards signing a new lease here.
Looks like I focused in on irrelevant subjects. This move is going to require my concentrated attention over a long period of time.
In connection to the move, I will have to solve several problems. One is the foundation problem. I have been thinking that one over quite a bit. Since I do not know much about it, I may need to consult with those who do. One idea I had was to dig out a hole, fill in with some concrete. Let it set, then pour a column of concrete that will be a pylon for the cabin to sit on. Actually, four pylons, one for each corner. I will run that by some folks who are more knowledgeable than myself, and see what they think. Such a plan can be executed by one or two people, I would think.
Another problem is the septic tank system, which I would rather avoid. I would rather install a composting system. The book I am reading can help me with that project. It looks like it is a good book with the information I need to at least make the proposition to the county health dude. If I can get that permitted, I would like a system that would not be too hard to build myself, or to contract it out without it breaking the bank.
Of course, there is the water problem, which I have been thinking of constantly. There are several posts here on that subject.
Since I am not very far along on any of these projects, I am a year away, most likely. It looks like I am not going anywhere anytime soon.
Wednesday, February 24, 2016
Tuesday, February 23, 2016
Quick post b4 I go
Arg. These android machines...
Anyway, the tone here seems pretty negative, I am sure. But I am working on the problems. Hopefully, there will be some viable solutions.
For example, the foundation issue. Since I have taken soil samples, I know that there is some clay in that soil, so it will be fairly stable, as long as you keep the water off it. That means growing plenty of grass around the place, so that the top soil can be anchored down, and does not get washed away.
As for the septic system, I am currently reading a book on that subject. If I can save bucks this way, it would be a big help. Something tells me though, that I may not get that result. But if you do not try, you will not know.
I did talk to my bro, and this little cabin will not be built soon. Perhaps this is months off into the future. In the meantime, I can get myself educated.
Too bad I was focused in so much on the bigger scene. The big scene can take care of itself. I am getting to the point where I do not know so much about taking care of my own business. Know whut I mean, Vern?
The discussion here may get more to the personal rather than the general. That may bore many of you, and off you go.
If that is the case, then let it be. I have other fish to fry.
Anyway, the tone here seems pretty negative, I am sure. But I am working on the problems. Hopefully, there will be some viable solutions.
For example, the foundation issue. Since I have taken soil samples, I know that there is some clay in that soil, so it will be fairly stable, as long as you keep the water off it. That means growing plenty of grass around the place, so that the top soil can be anchored down, and does not get washed away.
As for the septic system, I am currently reading a book on that subject. If I can save bucks this way, it would be a big help. Something tells me though, that I may not get that result. But if you do not try, you will not know.
I did talk to my bro, and this little cabin will not be built soon. Perhaps this is months off into the future. In the meantime, I can get myself educated.
Too bad I was focused in so much on the bigger scene. The big scene can take care of itself. I am getting to the point where I do not know so much about taking care of my own business. Know whut I mean, Vern?
The discussion here may get more to the personal rather than the general. That may bore many of you, and off you go.
If that is the case, then let it be. I have other fish to fry.
No deep thoughts, no revelations
Too tired for that. Yesterday, I had a trip to the Big D. It is a good paying gig, so I am happy to get it, but it wears you out.
I could swear that the little towns between here and there are just about dead. Nothing much going on outside the cities.
Houston seems more vibrant than Dallas for some reason. It may not be true, but this place seems more alive.
There are not many white people out there anymore. Not even in Dallas. This country is changing, alright. The Democrats love it too. Anything to make this country more socialistic, they are all for it.
The so called conservatives had better wake up that the country is gone. This is not the same country it once was.
There is so little time that I do not have the time to check the news. The Norks could have bombed us for all I know. By the way, have you noticed what the Norks have been doing? I think they are preparing for war against us. We have become so weak that Micky Mouse countries like this can take us down, and probably will. They will because this country will not wake the hell up. But the country cannot wake up because it is mostly dead already.
Donald Trump wants to make America great again. He may want to lower his sights. Keeping the country alive and intact should be his goal. This country is on the way out. Not too many people seem to grasp that, but I think I am starting to.
I could swear that the little towns between here and there are just about dead. Nothing much going on outside the cities.
Houston seems more vibrant than Dallas for some reason. It may not be true, but this place seems more alive.
There are not many white people out there anymore. Not even in Dallas. This country is changing, alright. The Democrats love it too. Anything to make this country more socialistic, they are all for it.
The so called conservatives had better wake up that the country is gone. This is not the same country it once was.
There is so little time that I do not have the time to check the news. The Norks could have bombed us for all I know. By the way, have you noticed what the Norks have been doing? I think they are preparing for war against us. We have become so weak that Micky Mouse countries like this can take us down, and probably will. They will because this country will not wake the hell up. But the country cannot wake up because it is mostly dead already.
Donald Trump wants to make America great again. He may want to lower his sights. Keeping the country alive and intact should be his goal. This country is on the way out. Not too many people seem to grasp that, but I think I am starting to.
Monday, February 22, 2016
Quick one before I go
It is not easy to use this android, but I repeat myself. Today, I have an opportunity to make some money early, so I will be leaving early. Before I do, I thought I would share some thoughts, but the thoughts escaped me. Doggone it.
I am trying to trace back to what I have been thinking this morning. I will not be going west to build that cabin soon. I have to tell my bro that, and be sure not to forget. Like a lot of other things I forget. I forget things fast these days.
This delivery thing may not work out, but I am going to give it my best. Too many things to have to have to worry about physically. If I can make it for six months, that would be a big help.
Sorry about the lite posting, but I am busy. Of course, I would like nothing better than to research things and then report them here. Trouble is, not enough people are interested. Too bad about that. What I got here on this blog is good stuff even if it is not appreciated by the crowd. The crowd can be wrong. We have too much faith in the crowd. The crowd was wrong in history. But people have forgotten their history, if they ever really learned it in the first place.
I have places to go and things to do, just like you do. I do not get a dime for any of this. But it is worth more than some of the stuff you have to pay to see. Just saying.
I am trying to trace back to what I have been thinking this morning. I will not be going west to build that cabin soon. I have to tell my bro that, and be sure not to forget. Like a lot of other things I forget. I forget things fast these days.
This delivery thing may not work out, but I am going to give it my best. Too many things to have to have to worry about physically. If I can make it for six months, that would be a big help.
Sorry about the lite posting, but I am busy. Of course, I would like nothing better than to research things and then report them here. Trouble is, not enough people are interested. Too bad about that. What I got here on this blog is good stuff even if it is not appreciated by the crowd. The crowd can be wrong. We have too much faith in the crowd. The crowd was wrong in history. But people have forgotten their history, if they ever really learned it in the first place.
I have places to go and things to do, just like you do. I do not get a dime for any of this. But it is worth more than some of the stuff you have to pay to see. Just saying.
Sunday, February 21, 2016
Obligatory, 2.21.16
After all the posting yesterday, there was not much left in the tank. Things to do, but mostly to rest up for the week ahead.
I got a book that might help with my presentation to the health agent for the county. It is possible that I may be able to avoid the septic tank. Cross my fingers on that one.
All in all, just plugging along. It is going to take longer than I anticipated.
There are those who may want me to just flat out quit, but I do not want to do that.
Anyway, there are things to do, and I have to attend to them.
I got a book that might help with my presentation to the health agent for the county. It is possible that I may be able to avoid the septic tank. Cross my fingers on that one.
All in all, just plugging along. It is going to take longer than I anticipated.
There are those who may want me to just flat out quit, but I do not want to do that.
Anyway, there are things to do, and I have to attend to them.
Saturday, February 20, 2016
Long and the short of it, part 3
It is getting late in the afternoon here. As I have written a couple of long posts, which are not my usual thing, I embark upon yet another post. Perhaps this one will be long. I don't know.
The posts got political. Yes, we are in an election year. It is time to choose our leaders for the next few years. This is of importance for our future. This is how we have done things in this country for the last couple hundred years. What I fear is that time may be coming to an end. Reason being that things are in far worse shape than most people may know.
Because the posts have been political, it may be considered suspect in terms of truth. One thing that I will try my darndest to not do is to deceive anyone. My purpose here is not to do that, but the opposite. I hope I am doing that. If I am not, then I am failing. If I am, I have to look at myself and understand why I am failing, and try to communicate my understanding of that to you, the audience.
As for audience, there are but a few who come here. This blog has not gotten much attention out there, which again, I regret. I don't know what I can do about that, but to try a little harder. But trying harder may not be enough, if that which is against you is not against because you are wrong, but because you are right. If you are right, then they are against you because they fear you.
Fear little old me? Let me tell you. If there was anybody to fear, it isn't me. I never hurt anyone. Unless it is your snowlflakey little feelings. Obviously, I am not into self esteem, as it is likely taught today. That's what "snowflake" is about. People need to earn their self esteem. They are not entitled to it, nor to anythng else that which they do not earn. All too often today, people seem to think that they are entitled to that which they have not earned.
So, I start off with some inspiration about courage as it pertains to leadership. I am trying to enlighten some of you. At least some of you out there who will pay attention. But in doing so, you may notice something. What am I criticizing if it is not my own self? Indeed I am. If there is anything to the statement "to know one is to be one yourself", then I know what cowardice is. I have lived that kind of life, let me tell you. And yes, I am sick to death of it. I am sick of disrespect that accrues to you even if you are falsely perceived as being less than adequate in the toughness department.
I don't believe that I am a "pussy". I will fight. I have fought, and frankly, have lost almost all my fights. No, I am not good with my fists. I am not good at fighting. But anybody can fight. What seemed important to some close to me in those days was that I lost. Not that I had enough guts to stick up for myself and fight back. I fought back even when I lost the fight. But never mind that. That makes me out to be more than I am. I will not portray myself as someone greater than what I am. I am merely what I said that I am. An old cowbody who is trying hard not to fall out of his saddle. That is all I am. I am not running for office. Merely trying to help sort out the wheat from the chaff. Merely trying to understand what has happened to our culture and our country, and to do something constructive about it.
So, I wonder. Do people not take what I say as something worthy of consideration merely because I am perceived as a hypocrite? Or someone who is weak and cowardly, not worthy of listening to?
If you think that way, you may be making a mistake. Even a crazy person can tell you something of value. There is this story of a crazy woman who was married to a spy. She told people that her husband was a spy, but because she was crazy, nobody paid attention to her. If people had listened, a dangerous spy would have been caught, and the damage done might have been limited. That is a true story, you people.
I think all too often, people listen to the "big guy" simply because he is big. Take Limbaugh for example. He is probably out there thiking that people who challenge him anonymously like I am doing are too chickenhearted to go after him personally. If anybody like him thinks that way, then come here and challenge me, and find out for yourself. No, I don't think I am too chicken to go after him. I think he will not hear me out fairly if I did. For there is something false about him. He thinks he is of high character, but I am not so sure.
I am after the Limbaughs out there. I think Limbaugh is a sell out. He talks a good game, that is for sure. People listen to him, but what good is there when he says something and there is nothing behind it?
Like I pointed out in the Lady Gaga post. It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that swing. The swing meaning courage. Nothing about Limbaugh says means anything because he doesn't back it up. He is afraid of losing his radio program.
Look, he may well lose his radio program if he uses it for activism. But he said he used to do Rush to Excellence tours. If he isn't doing these anymore, then what is stopping him? Somebody told him to shut up or else they will run him off the air?
Rush used to also say that he is in the relentless pursuit of the truth. Really? I am not so sure of that. I think he is relentless pursuit of advantage for himself. If he comes across the truth, if it hurts him, he will shut up. He said that himself when it came to doing his caller abortion segments. He let them shut him up over this.
Rush doesn't have it anymore. He may never have really had it at all. He was good when he was new, but what is doing now? Why should anybody listen to him now?
But a lot of people do listen to him. He endorses Cruz, which may be a sell out again. Does Limbaugh really believe that Cruz is Reagan? No. He had to say it because the so called conservatives are the only ones listening to him now. He has to say it in order to keep what audience he has. He won't bite the bullet and tell the truth.
Cruz is not Reagan. Reagan had command of the media. Trump is more like Reagan than Cruz ever thought about being. Limbaugh ain't dumb. But Limbaugh is talking ideology. But Reagan wasn't ideological. Reagan believed in America, but that doesn't make you ideological. Reagan was conservative all right, but something was behind it. Reagan really believed in it. That means his immortal soul was behind it. Yes, Reagan did believe in that. I am sure he believed that we all have a spirit and an immortal soul. Does Limbaugh, or is it just a prop to make money off the gullible who are easily deceived?
Limbaugh is on my fecal roster. He has something to prove in order to get off of it. Maybe the Limbaughs of this world don't care about what little guys like me think, but little guys like me make the show run. If the little guys got the idea that Limbaugh was a fake, his show would be over.
I think Limbaugh is a fake. Just sayin'
Previous Next
The posts got political. Yes, we are in an election year. It is time to choose our leaders for the next few years. This is of importance for our future. This is how we have done things in this country for the last couple hundred years. What I fear is that time may be coming to an end. Reason being that things are in far worse shape than most people may know.
Because the posts have been political, it may be considered suspect in terms of truth. One thing that I will try my darndest to not do is to deceive anyone. My purpose here is not to do that, but the opposite. I hope I am doing that. If I am not, then I am failing. If I am, I have to look at myself and understand why I am failing, and try to communicate my understanding of that to you, the audience.
As for audience, there are but a few who come here. This blog has not gotten much attention out there, which again, I regret. I don't know what I can do about that, but to try a little harder. But trying harder may not be enough, if that which is against you is not against because you are wrong, but because you are right. If you are right, then they are against you because they fear you.
Fear little old me? Let me tell you. If there was anybody to fear, it isn't me. I never hurt anyone. Unless it is your snowlflakey little feelings. Obviously, I am not into self esteem, as it is likely taught today. That's what "snowflake" is about. People need to earn their self esteem. They are not entitled to it, nor to anythng else that which they do not earn. All too often today, people seem to think that they are entitled to that which they have not earned.
So, I start off with some inspiration about courage as it pertains to leadership. I am trying to enlighten some of you. At least some of you out there who will pay attention. But in doing so, you may notice something. What am I criticizing if it is not my own self? Indeed I am. If there is anything to the statement "to know one is to be one yourself", then I know what cowardice is. I have lived that kind of life, let me tell you. And yes, I am sick to death of it. I am sick of disrespect that accrues to you even if you are falsely perceived as being less than adequate in the toughness department.
I don't believe that I am a "pussy". I will fight. I have fought, and frankly, have lost almost all my fights. No, I am not good with my fists. I am not good at fighting. But anybody can fight. What seemed important to some close to me in those days was that I lost. Not that I had enough guts to stick up for myself and fight back. I fought back even when I lost the fight. But never mind that. That makes me out to be more than I am. I will not portray myself as someone greater than what I am. I am merely what I said that I am. An old cowbody who is trying hard not to fall out of his saddle. That is all I am. I am not running for office. Merely trying to help sort out the wheat from the chaff. Merely trying to understand what has happened to our culture and our country, and to do something constructive about it.
So, I wonder. Do people not take what I say as something worthy of consideration merely because I am perceived as a hypocrite? Or someone who is weak and cowardly, not worthy of listening to?
If you think that way, you may be making a mistake. Even a crazy person can tell you something of value. There is this story of a crazy woman who was married to a spy. She told people that her husband was a spy, but because she was crazy, nobody paid attention to her. If people had listened, a dangerous spy would have been caught, and the damage done might have been limited. That is a true story, you people.
I think all too often, people listen to the "big guy" simply because he is big. Take Limbaugh for example. He is probably out there thiking that people who challenge him anonymously like I am doing are too chickenhearted to go after him personally. If anybody like him thinks that way, then come here and challenge me, and find out for yourself. No, I don't think I am too chicken to go after him. I think he will not hear me out fairly if I did. For there is something false about him. He thinks he is of high character, but I am not so sure.
I am after the Limbaughs out there. I think Limbaugh is a sell out. He talks a good game, that is for sure. People listen to him, but what good is there when he says something and there is nothing behind it?
Like I pointed out in the Lady Gaga post. It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that swing. The swing meaning courage. Nothing about Limbaugh says means anything because he doesn't back it up. He is afraid of losing his radio program.
Look, he may well lose his radio program if he uses it for activism. But he said he used to do Rush to Excellence tours. If he isn't doing these anymore, then what is stopping him? Somebody told him to shut up or else they will run him off the air?
Rush used to also say that he is in the relentless pursuit of the truth. Really? I am not so sure of that. I think he is relentless pursuit of advantage for himself. If he comes across the truth, if it hurts him, he will shut up. He said that himself when it came to doing his caller abortion segments. He let them shut him up over this.
Rush doesn't have it anymore. He may never have really had it at all. He was good when he was new, but what is doing now? Why should anybody listen to him now?
But a lot of people do listen to him. He endorses Cruz, which may be a sell out again. Does Limbaugh really believe that Cruz is Reagan? No. He had to say it because the so called conservatives are the only ones listening to him now. He has to say it in order to keep what audience he has. He won't bite the bullet and tell the truth.
Cruz is not Reagan. Reagan had command of the media. Trump is more like Reagan than Cruz ever thought about being. Limbaugh ain't dumb. But Limbaugh is talking ideology. But Reagan wasn't ideological. Reagan believed in America, but that doesn't make you ideological. Reagan was conservative all right, but something was behind it. Reagan really believed in it. That means his immortal soul was behind it. Yes, Reagan did believe in that. I am sure he believed that we all have a spirit and an immortal soul. Does Limbaugh, or is it just a prop to make money off the gullible who are easily deceived?
Limbaugh is on my fecal roster. He has something to prove in order to get off of it. Maybe the Limbaughs of this world don't care about what little guys like me think, but little guys like me make the show run. If the little guys got the idea that Limbaugh was a fake, his show would be over.
I think Limbaugh is a fake. Just sayin'
Previous Next
Long and short of it, part 2
This may not be a series of posts, but I have an inspiration. As long as I have it, I will write about it.
As with the first post, the inspiration, as such, is a revelation about what our problems really are in this society. The revelation is that our problems are spiritual in nature, not material.
To develop this further, I will need to discuss our leadership. Or the lack of leadership, to put it more accurately.
By the way, this may not be as long a post as the last one. The inspiration has its limits in time and space. And besides, I am mortal, I am here only a short time. I must attend to earthly needs, which means I don't have as much time as I'd like to spend on this.
Back to the leadership question. I've been complaining long and loud on this blog about the lack of it. I think it permeates our society much deeper than anyone knows. That's what makes it so dangerous. We are at the lip of a precipice, in which I think we may not be able to avoid falling into. If we had leadership, they would guide us away from it. Instead, they are guiding us straight towards the disaster. They are guiding us towards it because their concern is with themselves, not the people that they claim to serve.
Okay, after a brief break while I ate an early lunch, I got an idea that may take awhile to expound upon. The idea is about Presidential leadership, and since we are in an election year, it is also about Presidential politics.
PRESIDENTS ARE REMEMBERED MORE FOR FOREIGN POLICY SUCCESSES THAN FOR DOMESTIC POLICY FAILURES
Once again, I think of Nixon. People may not remember too much of his domestic policy, which failed against inflation, amongst other things; than with his foreign policy, which opened up China. As a long term success, the China policy may backfire. But in dealing with the problems at the time, it was a success in our Cold War rivalry with the Soviet Union
If Nixon isn't a good example, the let's look at George Herbert Walker Bush. He may be remembered for leading the country to success in the war in Iraq, but his failure with balancing the budget won't be remembered. I may get some disagreement with that, and you may be right to do so. However, balancing the budget isn't that important now, as it seemed to be then; as the Iraq debacle will be sometime in the future. Indeed, in future years, that little war in Iraq may be long remembered. We seem to have a problem with the Middle Easterners right now because of this. They have long memories.
We can go back even further to FDR. Roosevelt didn't really end the Great Depression. He won't be remembered for his failure to do so, but he will be remembered for winning World War II.
Incidentally, I think the victory over Germany and Japan is what helped end the depression. Not because of their defeat, but what it did to the UK and the rest of Europe. Europe has been defanged, and this has helped the USA become fat and rich, but it came at the price of what may come later. Actually, it may sooner than later, unfortunately.
All of these examples have something in common. Or I think they do. In winning World War II, FDR was acting in the best interest of the country. In winning in Iraq, Bush the Elder was trying to do what was in the country's best interest. Even Nixon, which I don't think much of, was trying to do his best to secure world peace. They did these things in service to country and a bit of risk to their own personal interests. Their personal interests would have been better served if their outcomes had been longer lasting and more durable. The risks they took didn't affect them personally at the time, but history may not be so favorable to them. The risk they took was with the verdict of history. Yet, they served the interests of the people alive at the time.
I'm straining a bit to make a point. The point is to serve the country at the expense of self. These Presidents tried to do that. Our current crop of leaders may not be able to. Even those in the history books may have failed too, because they failed to get victories that were longer lasting. But we made some amends to Europe, maybe too many. We tried in Iraq as well, but not hard enough in my opinion. As for opening up China? This helped Nixon win reelection in 1972, but that may not help us in the years to come.
The main point I think is valid. Presidents will be remembered for their foreign policy, not with their domestic policy. This should be true even of FDR, if Europe falls apart. It sure seems to be.
Good leadership comes from serving the country, not from serving the self. Think again towards history. The Roman Emperor, Honorius, did nothing to stop the sack of Rome in 410 AD. Indeed, he did a lot to cause it. The kind of leaders we have now may do a lot to cause the sack of the USA, which may be closer than you think. The reason being, that like Honorius, their concern will be with their own safety, not with their people's safety. Honorius was an unworthy leader. Our duty is to find somebody who is worthy.
THE CURRENT CROP OF GOP CANDIDATES MAY NOT BE WORTH A DAMN
But that doesn't make the Democrats any better. In fact, the Dems are even worse. Far worse. For if there is a party that puts self before all, it is the Democrat Party. They will talk about taxing the rich, as if this is what is meant about putting others first. But if you look closely, all Democrat policies go to help Democrats first. If it helps the people, that is only incidental.
But what about the GOP? Keep in mind here that I am referring to spiritual qualities. What is it that I call spiritual?
I was thinking about that definition on the way from the last post to this one. What I would prefer to call spiritual is that which makes life worth living. Those would be LOVE, COURAGE, AND FAITHFULNESS. Now, Trump may not have been faithful to his wife (s). He may not be the most lovable guy around. What he does have is GUTS. Besides that, he TELLS THE TRUTH. All these pussies out there are afraid to tell the truth today. Trump tells it like it is. He is faithful to the truth, which counts for a lot in my book.
That is something. If he had nothing at all, well he just might be a Democrat.
Democrats might feel love, but they don't necessarily act upon it. Neither do the RINOS.
Democrats aren't completely short of courage, but they have more than the conservatives, who have none at all that I can see.
Democrats aren't faithful to anything but their own selves. That alone makes them formidable. Even without that much of anything else. It is also what makes them dangerous. They can stick together like glue. That party is like the friggin' Mafia. They act like the Mafia.
Cruz? Puhleeze. He has had maybe four years now in the Senate. What exactly has he done that inspires such confidence? He has picked a few fights and he has lost them all. Whoop de do. You need to stick with the fight and make the other guy bloody your nose, or a lot worse. Maybe make both eyes black and a bloody nose. Or have to be carried out of the place. Otherwise you aren't fighting. Does that make Cruz a "pussy"? Maybe not. But he ain't exactly pugnacious either. Give me a fighter. A guy who won't quit until you knock his ass out.
Cruz may have a little courage, but we may need a whole lot more. We have to take on the bad guys over there and over here. There are a lot of them. Not that many of US.
Trump has GUTS. Give me the GUY who has guts. Spiritual doesn't necessarily mean acting like a Sunday school teacher. The world stage ain't Sunday School. It's a bad neighborhood, and you need a butt kicker in charge. Let the Sunday School Teachers teach Sunday School to the snowflakes. It is a tough world out there. Snowflakes don't have what it takes to deal with the bad guys.
St. Peter is said to have had a "potty mouth". If Jesus could forgive Peter for his language, then we should be able to forgive Trump for his. He is good enough to be President, thank you very much.
I could be all wrong about Cruz, but if he is really a creampuff, he is going to get his butt kicked.
Part 1
Part 3
As with the first post, the inspiration, as such, is a revelation about what our problems really are in this society. The revelation is that our problems are spiritual in nature, not material.
To develop this further, I will need to discuss our leadership. Or the lack of leadership, to put it more accurately.
By the way, this may not be as long a post as the last one. The inspiration has its limits in time and space. And besides, I am mortal, I am here only a short time. I must attend to earthly needs, which means I don't have as much time as I'd like to spend on this.
Back to the leadership question. I've been complaining long and loud on this blog about the lack of it. I think it permeates our society much deeper than anyone knows. That's what makes it so dangerous. We are at the lip of a precipice, in which I think we may not be able to avoid falling into. If we had leadership, they would guide us away from it. Instead, they are guiding us straight towards the disaster. They are guiding us towards it because their concern is with themselves, not the people that they claim to serve.
Okay, after a brief break while I ate an early lunch, I got an idea that may take awhile to expound upon. The idea is about Presidential leadership, and since we are in an election year, it is also about Presidential politics.
PRESIDENTS ARE REMEMBERED MORE FOR FOREIGN POLICY SUCCESSES THAN FOR DOMESTIC POLICY FAILURES
Once again, I think of Nixon. People may not remember too much of his domestic policy, which failed against inflation, amongst other things; than with his foreign policy, which opened up China. As a long term success, the China policy may backfire. But in dealing with the problems at the time, it was a success in our Cold War rivalry with the Soviet Union
If Nixon isn't a good example, the let's look at George Herbert Walker Bush. He may be remembered for leading the country to success in the war in Iraq, but his failure with balancing the budget won't be remembered. I may get some disagreement with that, and you may be right to do so. However, balancing the budget isn't that important now, as it seemed to be then; as the Iraq debacle will be sometime in the future. Indeed, in future years, that little war in Iraq may be long remembered. We seem to have a problem with the Middle Easterners right now because of this. They have long memories.
We can go back even further to FDR. Roosevelt didn't really end the Great Depression. He won't be remembered for his failure to do so, but he will be remembered for winning World War II.
Incidentally, I think the victory over Germany and Japan is what helped end the depression. Not because of their defeat, but what it did to the UK and the rest of Europe. Europe has been defanged, and this has helped the USA become fat and rich, but it came at the price of what may come later. Actually, it may sooner than later, unfortunately.
All of these examples have something in common. Or I think they do. In winning World War II, FDR was acting in the best interest of the country. In winning in Iraq, Bush the Elder was trying to do what was in the country's best interest. Even Nixon, which I don't think much of, was trying to do his best to secure world peace. They did these things in service to country and a bit of risk to their own personal interests. Their personal interests would have been better served if their outcomes had been longer lasting and more durable. The risks they took didn't affect them personally at the time, but history may not be so favorable to them. The risk they took was with the verdict of history. Yet, they served the interests of the people alive at the time.
I'm straining a bit to make a point. The point is to serve the country at the expense of self. These Presidents tried to do that. Our current crop of leaders may not be able to. Even those in the history books may have failed too, because they failed to get victories that were longer lasting. But we made some amends to Europe, maybe too many. We tried in Iraq as well, but not hard enough in my opinion. As for opening up China? This helped Nixon win reelection in 1972, but that may not help us in the years to come.
The main point I think is valid. Presidents will be remembered for their foreign policy, not with their domestic policy. This should be true even of FDR, if Europe falls apart. It sure seems to be.
Good leadership comes from serving the country, not from serving the self. Think again towards history. The Roman Emperor, Honorius, did nothing to stop the sack of Rome in 410 AD. Indeed, he did a lot to cause it. The kind of leaders we have now may do a lot to cause the sack of the USA, which may be closer than you think. The reason being, that like Honorius, their concern will be with their own safety, not with their people's safety. Honorius was an unworthy leader. Our duty is to find somebody who is worthy.
THE CURRENT CROP OF GOP CANDIDATES MAY NOT BE WORTH A DAMN
But that doesn't make the Democrats any better. In fact, the Dems are even worse. Far worse. For if there is a party that puts self before all, it is the Democrat Party. They will talk about taxing the rich, as if this is what is meant about putting others first. But if you look closely, all Democrat policies go to help Democrats first. If it helps the people, that is only incidental.
But what about the GOP? Keep in mind here that I am referring to spiritual qualities. What is it that I call spiritual?
I was thinking about that definition on the way from the last post to this one. What I would prefer to call spiritual is that which makes life worth living. Those would be LOVE, COURAGE, AND FAITHFULNESS. Now, Trump may not have been faithful to his wife (s). He may not be the most lovable guy around. What he does have is GUTS. Besides that, he TELLS THE TRUTH. All these pussies out there are afraid to tell the truth today. Trump tells it like it is. He is faithful to the truth, which counts for a lot in my book.
That is something. If he had nothing at all, well he just might be a Democrat.
Democrats might feel love, but they don't necessarily act upon it. Neither do the RINOS.
Democrats aren't completely short of courage, but they have more than the conservatives, who have none at all that I can see.
Democrats aren't faithful to anything but their own selves. That alone makes them formidable. Even without that much of anything else. It is also what makes them dangerous. They can stick together like glue. That party is like the friggin' Mafia. They act like the Mafia.
Cruz? Puhleeze. He has had maybe four years now in the Senate. What exactly has he done that inspires such confidence? He has picked a few fights and he has lost them all. Whoop de do. You need to stick with the fight and make the other guy bloody your nose, or a lot worse. Maybe make both eyes black and a bloody nose. Or have to be carried out of the place. Otherwise you aren't fighting. Does that make Cruz a "pussy"? Maybe not. But he ain't exactly pugnacious either. Give me a fighter. A guy who won't quit until you knock his ass out.
Cruz may have a little courage, but we may need a whole lot more. We have to take on the bad guys over there and over here. There are a lot of them. Not that many of US.
Trump has GUTS. Give me the GUY who has guts. Spiritual doesn't necessarily mean acting like a Sunday school teacher. The world stage ain't Sunday School. It's a bad neighborhood, and you need a butt kicker in charge. Let the Sunday School Teachers teach Sunday School to the snowflakes. It is a tough world out there. Snowflakes don't have what it takes to deal with the bad guys.
St. Peter is said to have had a "potty mouth". If Jesus could forgive Peter for his language, then we should be able to forgive Trump for his. He is good enough to be President, thank you very much.
I could be all wrong about Cruz, but if he is really a creampuff, he is going to get his butt kicked.
Part 1
Part 3
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)