So, what I am going to do for Turkey Day? Nuthin! Maybe watch some football games. That's about it.
Maybe I'll blog here. Time for sitting on your backside and doing nothing as far as I'm concerned. Time to rest the old bones.
I was out in the traffic until about 6:40 pm or so. It's nuts to do stuff when everybody else is. I'd rather avoid the crowds.
Al Fin: "Cowboy Commentary", aka "Eat your veggies" The Flag banner is posted in order to defy those who would make patriotic symbols illegal or disreputable.
Wednesday, November 25, 2015
Once again, I am amazed at the media
They are shocked, shocked, that Trump said something that wasn't so. That Trump is being accused of lying hasn't even been demonstrated yet, or, for that matter, whether or not what he said is actually false. No, they accuse him of lying without having demonstrated that fact ( as best as I can tell ).
While they are doing that, they aren't shocked at Hillary's lies about Benghazi. It was demonstrated that she lied when one of her own emails was discovered that shows that she knew that the Benghazi attacks, which killed 4 Americans, was a terrorist attack instead of a video that she was claiming at the time.
The news media isn't news media when they play favorites. They are propaganda ministries, and should be regulated as such.
While they are doing that, they aren't shocked at Hillary's lies about Benghazi. It was demonstrated that she lied when one of her own emails was discovered that shows that she knew that the Benghazi attacks, which killed 4 Americans, was a terrorist attack instead of a video that she was claiming at the time.
The news media isn't news media when they play favorites. They are propaganda ministries, and should be regulated as such.
The propaganda is being pumped out a ton a second
You really have to hand it to the left wing goonie birds. They can really keep a line of bravo sierra alive for the longest time. Just checked out the Mahablog. What a load of bull that is. Can't believe I took the broad seriously for awhile. ( Only a short time in 2006 when Bush was going amnesty on us. )
I seriously considered taking her link down, but I'd be doing the same thing she did to me when she banned me from commenting on her blog. That kind of thing is in the province of the left. Wouldn't want to emulate these goonie birds. I think they are about to go extinct.
I seriously considered taking her link down, but I'd be doing the same thing she did to me when she banned me from commenting on her blog. That kind of thing is in the province of the left. Wouldn't want to emulate these goonie birds. I think they are about to go extinct.
Do the climateers want to regulate carbon or carbon dioxide?
Because carbon is a solid and carbon dioxide is a gas.
The AGW crowd needs to get its story straight. Does carbon cause climate change too, even though it isn't in the atmosphere if it is only carbon?
You see the problem here is that the words get redefined. What was understood is getting redefined constantly. You go from carbon dioxide to carbon meaning that the effort is to end all fossil fuels, which isn't necessary if all you want to do is to eliminate carbon dioxide only. Because there is more than one way to get energy out the carbon based fossil fuels. The other way doesn't need to cause carbon dioxide releases into the atmosphere. If you want to regulate carbon, then it is no longer carbon dioxide, the words got redefined.
The AGW crowd needs to get its story straight. Does carbon cause climate change too, even though it isn't in the atmosphere if it is only carbon?
You see the problem here is that the words get redefined. What was understood is getting redefined constantly. You go from carbon dioxide to carbon meaning that the effort is to end all fossil fuels, which isn't necessary if all you want to do is to eliminate carbon dioxide only. Because there is more than one way to get energy out the carbon based fossil fuels. The other way doesn't need to cause carbon dioxide releases into the atmosphere. If you want to regulate carbon, then it is no longer carbon dioxide, the words got redefined.
From the sublime to the ridiculous
Obama, aka "The Messiah", really is going to lower the sea levels AND cure AGW. This monumental bravo sierra is the one that ought to get the "Four Pinnochios" from the so-called Fact Checkers. Don't hold your breath on that one.
Update:
Also, should point out that he will whip terrorists too ( which don't exist ) all with one swift stroke. What a guy! /sarc
Update:
Maybe it was ridiculous all along. Remember Obama on a Unicorn?
Update:
Also, should point out that he will whip terrorists too ( which don't exist ) all with one swift stroke. What a guy! /sarc
Update:
Maybe it was ridiculous all along. Remember Obama on a Unicorn?
 |
| Time for some campainin' : Obama's ride on a Unicorn of 'Change' |
Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?
Eyewitness to celebrating Muslims in New Jersey on 9.11
Summary: The media showed the celebrations and are now covering it up.
Comment: Doesn't surprise me. I've known the media is a bunch of liars for the longest time.
What's worse, they are claiming that they care about the truth when they are the worst liars out there. There ought to be a law against this. I know first amendment issues may prevent that, but no NEWS organization should be allowed to do it and call itself a NEWS ORGANIZATION.
Summary: The media showed the celebrations and are now covering it up.
Comment: Doesn't surprise me. I've known the media is a bunch of liars for the longest time.
What's worse, they are claiming that they care about the truth when they are the worst liars out there. There ought to be a law against this. I know first amendment issues may prevent that, but no NEWS organization should be allowed to do it and call itself a NEWS ORGANIZATION.
Tuesday, November 24, 2015
Good question
A good question is one in which the person being asked does not have an answer. Or maybe not a good answer.
Just saw this on Pundit Press blurb- a question:
"if the crime in places with strict gun laws is driven by people smuggling guns in from places with "lax" gun restrictions - why isn't crime higher in those lax places?"
Answer: Most likely there is no answer that the gun-control people can give without contradicting their political position. The gun-control people want you to believe that guns cause crime, but guns only cause crime when only the bad guys have guns. Run that one by a lefty and what do you get? You probably get called a name. Name calling is the only argument they have.
Just saw this on Pundit Press blurb- a question:
"if the crime in places with strict gun laws is driven by people smuggling guns in from places with "lax" gun restrictions - why isn't crime higher in those lax places?"
Answer: Most likely there is no answer that the gun-control people can give without contradicting their political position. The gun-control people want you to believe that guns cause crime, but guns only cause crime when only the bad guys have guns. Run that one by a lefty and what do you get? You probably get called a name. Name calling is the only argument they have.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)