Fake news

Accusations based upon no evidence CAN be used to stir up trouble. The article link describes two such cases-- one in the past, and one in the present.

Here's the trouble: If there's no freedom of speech, the other side of the story does not get mentioned. If you have only one side of the story, you are going to be misled.

Keep in mind that the DSA wants to eliminate all the checks and balances, and end the Bill of Rights. Don't think so? Based upon what I've seen that is what they're planning.

For example, if the filibuster is removed, then they can pass any law they want. Even if it is plainly unconstitutional. Why? They want to pack the Supreme Court with their own people--the same people who want to end the 2nd Amendment, and you might as well include the 1st Amendment as well. All the other rights in the Bill of Rights will go too. No checks and balances. No Bill of Rights. Just one party dicatorial rule by communists. Thus, if a law is plainly unconstitutional, it won't matter because the leftist court will say anything that fits their agenda is constitutional. Who could argue with the Supreme Court and its authority? They are counting on that kind of unbridled power.

The dishonesty certainly doesn't stop with hoaxes like the article mentioned. The James Carville types don't want to tell you these things, but as he said, "don't run on it, just do it". That is a form of dishonesty too. In fact, it is plain out and out FRAUD.

Is that what you doomers and black pillers really want?