Proof that the Russian collusion investigation is bogus

Updated,

11.27.19:

This guy could be really, really dirty.  Check this quote:

Besides attempting to portray Clinesmith as a low-level FBI employee who had little or no bearing on the actual decision-making process, there has also been speculation that Clinesmith’s document alterations may have been limited to underlying Woods documents.

The upcoming IG FISA report may shed more light upon the matter.

More on this story at the link below:

Clinesmith also played a critical role in the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign.

Clinesmith was cited in the 2018 IG report as being “the primary FBI attorney assigned to that investigation beginning in early 2017.”https://t.co/a10C4wgIjZ https://t.co/4TA6Dm97Bz

— Jeff Carlson (@themarketswork) November 27, 2019

5.15.19:

9:06 am:

Did St. Baker leak the Steele dossier to David Corn, his buddy?  If he did, then what of it?  Well, the David Corn write up was the first, or one of the first,  new media write-ups about the Dossier.  It was also how the Dossier was "authenticated".  Yep.  It ought to sound ridiculous that this media source could be used as a verification process, but that might have been how it happened.

Baker would need to be part of the vetting process in the Woods Procedures, yes?  Well, no.  He might have been, but somebody was asleep at the switch, evidently.

Good God.

6:52 am:

John Solomon says red flags on Steele went to top FBI well before FISA warrant on Page...

6:17 am:

Look, before anybody thinks "partisan" here, Baker is shown in the clip answering questions about how this oppo research gets into a FISA app.  Who's Baker?  Why the Saint Baker guy, who's word cannot be questioned.

5:30 am:

Trish Regan last nite

*IF*- as I suspect- the FBI relied on OPPOSITION research (a bunch of hearsay and tabloid JUNK) to SPY on an American for POLITICAL purposes, this is the BIGGEST scandal in modern American political history. #TrishRegan pic.twitter.com/dlKv2zqbPP

— Trish Regan (@trish_regan) May 15, 2019

Woods Procedures followed????  Are you kidding me????  How is it even possible for these procedures to have been followed in the slightest?


5.14.19:

It is hard to believe that anybody can keep a straight face and actually say that the Woods Procedures were followed.

It is, even more, the case today than when this post was written.  We now have the Kavalec memo, that warned of the false information being given by their source, Christopher Steele.

The procedures require that it start out at an FBI field office, and work its way up the ladder.  It looks like this wasn't even close to being followed.  Especially when Kavlec memo shows up, how do they proceed with a FISA warrant?  Look at this excerpt from the Hill:

How does Kavalec's memo get past this process???????

The Woods procedures were ignored or waived for some reason.  The kind of warrant issued on Carter Page was the most intrusive of its kind.  There had to be a very, very, very good reason for issuing this warrant.

But there wasn't.



2.4.18:

Because they violated the Woods Procedures, which governs the FISA Title I warrant process.

The entire investigation is bogus and should be halted at once.

Exceptional Work by Sharyl Attkisson - Did FBI Violate Woods Procedures?... https://t.co/JVdDi5a4Lk via @thelastrefuge2

— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) February 5, 2018