What could blow the whole case wide open

Updated,

11.28.19:

This April 2018 article linked to in the tweet is quite complex and lengthy.  The main thing that I get from it is the systematic abuse of a system that had extensive checks built-in.  These checks were willfully violated.  Yet these people like to preach to the rest of us about " the rule of law".

It is a scary thing that these people may escape justice for what they did.  The next time they are in power, it will be a lot worse.

🚨I suspect there may be some fun surprises in the @JusticeOIG #FISA Report. This is a MUST read for anyone who cares about this.

Thanks to @themarketswork for his diligent research...https://t.co/BYTRuYIAP5

— K[Ash] 🇨🇦🇺🇸🇮🇱 (@finwiz416) November 28, 2019

4.30.19:

The last post shows that the NSA could determine for a fact whether or not that there was a Russian hack or a DNC leak of the Wikileak emails.  In addition, the NSA has already been audited, which found that the NSA was being used improperly, possibly for domestic spying on political opposition during the Obama Administration.   This would be probable cause for an investigation for violations of the Hatch Act.

In a very lengthy and detailed post, Sundance traces through the domestic spying angle, which began just prior to the 2016 election.

In summary, the Russian collusion angle is and continues to be, a cover story for this abuse.  Should this abuse be provable, it is a clear violation of the Hatch Act.  Indeed, the NSA is not supposed to be used for internal political advantage. 

Therefore, the NSA FISA 702's are key.

The Obama Use of FISA-702 as a Domestic Political Surveillance Program.... https://t.co/MCoqPtvOiM via @thelastrefuge2

— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) April 30, 2019

A bit more from the 702-Abuses from an earlier CTH post of Jan. 8 2018:

Early 2016, Admiral Rogers became aware of violations of FISA section 702 (17) surveillance act

As a result of an audit, NSA compliance officer briefed Admiral Rogers on October 20th, 2016

It appears that this isn't new news, as Senator Lankford has questioned Rogers about it already.  But now the Mueller Report is out, and they found no "collusion/conspiracy".  In addition, Barr wants to find the real predicate for the investigation.  Could this be the real predicate and not the PapaD disclosures mentioned in the Mueller report?

For the total background story, read all of the CTH links of Jan 2018 above.

To see how that fits together, read that link, plus the one from the embedded tweet at the top of the page.

Eighty-five percent noncompliance:

CTH: "All of this is laid out inside this 99-page opinion from FISC Presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer who also noted that none of this FISA abuse was accidental"

Again, the Twitter link and the background link are very lengthy reads, but they hold the key to blowing this whole thing open.  However, the fact that Clapper and Brennan are not in jail shows the difficulty in bringing this to justice.