Wait a minute...

Update:

Seems like I heard that the Russians that were indicted based upon questionable evidence.  In other words, the 12 Russians were indicted upon something which hasn't been proven, nor is ever likely to be.

If the Russians interfered, where's the proof?  Why are these people afraid of the truth being put on public display?  If they are so sure of this charge, why not put it into open court?

Again, this is not to "defend" the Russians.  It is more important to defend the truth.

Julian Assange, of Wikeleaks, offered to testify that his source was not Russia.  Comey refused to grant immunity so that Assange could testify.  Why?

Could it be that this didn't happen the way that the Democrats are claiming? 

the original post of July last year:

Why is Insty posting that it is "widely known" that the Russians interfered in our elections??????

This hasn't been established as fact.  What the hell are these people doing???????

All we have is the claim from the Dems that their emails were hacked.  But there hasn't been an independent verification that this even occurred.  Or did I miss something?  Don't think so.  I don't think it is I who is missing something.

Fusion GPS and the other one--- Crowdstrike or something like that, are the entities who are supposedly "investigating" the hack.  The FBI (FIB) has put their seal of approval on it, but the FBI is compromised as far as I am concerned.  Not only them, but the entire government structure is compromised.    Until that is cleared up, whatever is claimed has not been established as fact, and SHOULD NOT BE WRITTEN UP AS SUCH.

More fake news, but this time, it is coming from those who should know better.

The rot is getting deeper...