AGW discussion 104

Updated:

2:19 pm:

Actually, the Idiocracy reference has already been used.  But in using it, it proves my point.  These people act out the dystopia, whereas the adults in the room try to point it out--- usually to no avail.


1:25 pm:

It should be noted that-- all of the discussion in the news about the AGW Quasi Theory deals in irrelevancies.

The irrelevancies are topics like rising seas, changing temperatures, melting glaciers, stranded polar bears, and so forth.  These are irrelevant because none addresses the cause of these events.

It is the cause of the phenomenon that is at issue.  If the cause is not addressed, then what are they talking about?  Just normal news items like floods and endangered wildlife.

If you want to correct this, like I try to do, you have to go against the tide so to speak.  All of the attention goes to the events, but nothing is mentioned about the cause of said events.  It is assumed to be carbon dioxide emissions, but that discussion does not take place.

If all they did was to talk about carbon dioxide and the so-called science behind the AGW theory, nobody would watch their "news".

Easier to sell as "news", but really just so much entertainment.

Might as well be watching "Beef Supreme" in the movie Idiocracy.