Saturday, February 15, 2020
Don't miss this
|
Thursday, February 13, 2020
Bongino show today
|
Bongino laid down lots of interesting stuff today. Amongst these is the news about Flynn,
in which Flynn's new attorney, Sidney Powell, has claimed that the first attorney, "Covington",
did a poor job of representing him.
The interesting part was that there was a conflict of interest. Covington gave bad advice
to Flynn, and the Mueller gang used that information to charge Flynn with a crime.
But get this--- It was Eric Holder who was on the Covington team when this all went down.
Got that? In other words, Holder may have framed Flynn. Covington represented Flynn in
the original filing of the FARA report that supposedly Flynn had to file. But what if
Flynn didn't have to do that, and the government prosecuted a case even though Flynn
didn't do anything wrong, and was misrepresented by a law firm who had a prominent member who
political ax to grind?
It's a serious conflict of interest and now the court is going to look into it.
It amazes me that Flynn's case hasn't been thrown out yet. The way this is going, the
only ending that will make any sense at all is if the case is indeed thrown out.
Niacin Lowers Cholesterol Better than Prescription Drugs
2.13.20:
2.8.13:
thebetterhealthstore.com
There was a book out more than 20 years ago that mentioned the benefits of niacin. It also included a reference to oat bran as helpful also. I tried the oat bran, but it was hard on my stomach, so I stopped that. In addition, I never bothered trying the niacin part.
It turned out that later, the oat bran part of this cholesterol cure was discredited.
Evidently, this was a bit premature. There does appear to be a benefit of oatmeal as well as niacin. I've been reading on this subject this morning, and the stuff out there surprises me a bit. For more information about foods that help you with your cholesterol, check this slideshow.
Update:
Oldie, but maybe a goodie. It so happens that I'm trying this experiment with oat bran and niacin in order to see if it helps with my own cholesterol. It will be a while before my next wellness visit, though.
Oldie, but maybe a goodie. It so happens that I'm trying this experiment with oat bran and niacin in order to see if it helps with my own cholesterol. It will be a while before my next wellness visit, though.
2.8.13:
thebetterhealthstore.com
Examiner | Rachel Hillier Pratt | A new study out shows vitamin B3, also known as niacin, lowers bad cholesterol more effectively than a common statin drug, ezetimibe, sold as Zetia...However a new study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, not only shows niacin contributing to a more significant drop in bad cholesterol (LDL), but also shows increases in the amount of good cholesterol (HDL). ..high doses of vitamin B3 can cause occasional discomfort known as flushing. According to the homesteading website, Doctoryourself, flushing causes “a pinkness about the cheeks, ears, neck, forearms and perhaps elsewhere. A slight niacin flush should end in about ten minutes or so.
There was a book out more than 20 years ago that mentioned the benefits of niacin. It also included a reference to oat bran as helpful also. I tried the oat bran, but it was hard on my stomach, so I stopped that. In addition, I never bothered trying the niacin part.
It turned out that later, the oat bran part of this cholesterol cure was discredited.
Evidently, this was a bit premature. There does appear to be a benefit of oatmeal as well as niacin. I've been reading on this subject this morning, and the stuff out there surprises me a bit. For more information about foods that help you with your cholesterol, check this slideshow.
Letting their freak flag fly
2.13.20:
2.12.20:
The commie and the peter puffer seem to be the front runners in the freaky Olympics, aka Democrat nominating process.
If the commie wins the presidency, you can say goodbye to economic growth, if not outright sanity. But come to think of it, sanity left the Democrats four years ago at the very least. They've been going nuts for a lot longer than that.
You have to be really over-the-top in order to make Hillary look good. Without Hillary, they are lost. With Hillary, they threatened to take us over into the Twilight Zone.
I'd like to think that neither a commie or peter puffer would have a chance to win, but Obama won in 2008 and again in 2012, so who knows?
Considering that the GOP doesn't care that much about winning, maybe those wins can be explained away. At any rate, it is hard to see Trump losing to these whack jobs. The control of Congress is a different matter. Trump is a serious person, but the Congress-critters need to grow up.
Update:
It's all related to this kind of behavior. The leftists will preach about the rule of law, then proceed directly to overthrow it. The amendment at the time gave a deadline for ratification. The deadline has long since passed, but now the Democrats want to claim that the deadline didn't matter in the first place. To these monsters, those words mean nothing now, but they did then. If the law itself said a deadline existed then, then there is a deadline now, or the law means nothing.
This is not about the rule of law, but the opposite. Do it the right way, or there will be nothing legitimate about it. Pass it in Congress, then submit it to the states. Otherwise, it is just a way around the law.
It's all related to this kind of behavior. The leftists will preach about the rule of law, then proceed directly to overthrow it. The amendment at the time gave a deadline for ratification. The deadline has long since passed, but now the Democrats want to claim that the deadline didn't matter in the first place. To these monsters, those words mean nothing now, but they did then. If the law itself said a deadline existed then, then there is a deadline now, or the law means nothing.
This is not about the rule of law, but the opposite. Do it the right way, or there will be nothing legitimate about it. Pass it in Congress, then submit it to the states. Otherwise, it is just a way around the law.
2.12.20:
The commie and the peter puffer seem to be the front runners in the freaky Olympics, aka Democrat nominating process.
If the commie wins the presidency, you can say goodbye to economic growth, if not outright sanity. But come to think of it, sanity left the Democrats four years ago at the very least. They've been going nuts for a lot longer than that.
You have to be really over-the-top in order to make Hillary look good. Without Hillary, they are lost. With Hillary, they threatened to take us over into the Twilight Zone.
I'd like to think that neither a commie or peter puffer would have a chance to win, but Obama won in 2008 and again in 2012, so who knows?
Considering that the GOP doesn't care that much about winning, maybe those wins can be explained away. At any rate, it is hard to see Trump losing to these whack jobs. The control of Congress is a different matter. Trump is a serious person, but the Congress-critters need to grow up.
Wednesday, February 12, 2020
Harrison Ford mocks 'son of a b----' Donald Trump during Jimmy Kimmel appearance | Fox News
Harrison Ford called Donald Trump a "son of a b----" during an appearance on late-night TV Monday where he also took another shot at the president for seemingly rejecting science. | Fox News
He looked better and made more sense when he was frozen in carbonite.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
