Biden better President than George Washington?
Washington made a country. Biden is destroying this country. What are these people thinking? Some of them claim to be Republicans.
A deeper read into the article reveals something's wrong here besides this. Perhaps the people taking the poll actually lied---that or they are ignorant as hell.
Al Fin: "Cowboy Commentary", aka "Eat your veggies" The Flag banner is posted in order to defy those who would make patriotic symbols illegal or disreputable.
Saturday, December 9, 2023
RAW EGG NATIONALIST: Vivek is not afraid to bring up 'red pill' issues Americans are being gaslit about
Ramaswamy and DeSantis should duke it out. Nikki Haley and Crhistie should drop out.
.@Babygravy9 to @Jackposobiec: "Anybody who even mentions the phrase 'the great replacement or replacement migration' is immediately branded a dangerous right-wing conspiracy theorist." pic.twitter.com/h221bVSDzj
— Human Events (@HumanEvents) December 7, 2023
J6th a setup, he says
But of course it was. There's another problem in that this lie has been going on for nearly 3 years now. After 3 years, we are talking about the next lie on their list.
You have to get out in front of these phony political games. The perps shouldn't be a step ahead all the time.
EXPLAINED: Jan. 6 was a set-up, in under a minute.
— Viva Frei (@thevivafrei) December 9, 2023
Even braindead Democrats will be forced to acknowledge it. They’ll just justify the necessity of it.
Share away. pic.twitter.com/aPXWr07kQ4
Friday, December 8, 2023
Cowardly betrayal
Update 1 of today's post:
The Wikipedia entry may have scrubbed some important details. I've scanned it a bit. Robert Novak wrote the piece that supposedly generated all the hullabaloo. Novak said who his source was no partisan gunslingers, as the "investigators" knew who was responsible for the leak all along. I don't see Novak's side of the story in the Wikipedia.
There may have been two officials who leaked. One mentioned on a separate Wikipedia article was Richard Armitrage. It is my recollection that the other was probably the one who talked to Novak--- that would be someone named Negroponte.
This was known prior to the naming of a Special Prosecutor. There was no need for any investigation. It was written that the leak did no harm to Plame nor national security. But it did get Scooter Libbey jailed and disbarred. It also discredited the Bush Administration. John Ashcroft should have known these details, as Novak's responses were all over the media--- and should have quashed the investigation. But he recused himself instead--a wimp out. I interpret that as weakness. It should be obvious that the Dems learned that they could use similar shady techniques to bring down their political enemies.
It is weakness because innocent people get harmed. It is weak because the justice system gets tarnished. It is weak because it is an abuse of power. But Krispy Kreme and his ilk like to virtue signal how Polly Pure they are, when they are really a bunch of door mats for a weaponized and politicized DOJ.
end update 1:
12/08/23: Update for the posted entry of 4/5/19:
In the most recent debate for GOP nomination for Prez, Krispy Kreme said that he would nominate someone like Ashcroft for Attorney General. Now, let's go back to the Scooter Libbey case, and we'll see WHY this should be a big RED FLAG against Kripsy Kreme.
For the record here, Scooter Libbey was innocent of revealing Valerie Plame's identity. He was prosecuted unjustly for a crime for it was well known WHO DID, and that person was never prosecuted. The real purpose of the prosecution was to discredit the Bush Administration, which succeeded because Libbey was convicted of a process crime.
This has been explained plenty of times before. You have to be an idiot if you cannot see the problem with this. But it continues to this very day with Trump. But Krispy Kreme wants another AG just like the guy who got rolled, so that they could get some way to discredit Bush.
Also, for the record, you are STUPID if you help your enemies defeat you. Krispy Kreme isn't serious. If he believes what he says, he is at best, a useful idiot for the left.
To back up what I just wrote, I include an embed at the point in which Krispy Kreme says he would appoint another Ashcroft who permitted the prosecution of Scooter Libbey, and set the precedent for what has been happening to Trump, and what would definitely happen to any Republican who opposed the commie left. Watch this carefully and think.
end update:
Updated:
4.5.19:
Over at the Last Refuge, the proposition is being laid out that the perps knew that there was no collusion case, and were pursuing a Scooter Libbey type obstruction case.
Yep, and I predicted that on Day One.
Yet, today, I am not feeling anything about it all. At the time, you can see that I was quite upset.
There's nothing to be angry about anymore. At least, not for me. Perhaps this is all a revelation today for some, and their reaction is late.
Mueller should have been fired on Day One. I must have written it a hundred times. Maybe my view will be eventually upheld. Ironic that the impetus for this could come from the Democrats themselves. I am sure that the more information comes out, the worse it will be for them. In fact, they may know this already. For them, saving their own skins is their prime concern. They can go about in their pretentious concern about transparency, but I would wager that a dollar to a donut that this bozos are praying real hard that the report stays as secret as possible.
5.17.17:
These rotten cowardly scum named a special counsel for a crime that does not exist.
Un-freaking-believable.
I guess this really is a coup.
There is absolutely no reason for this. NONE.
20:06
Rosenstein appointed the rotten f**k. I don't care who the guy is, to take this job is a travesty. To appoint this guy is a travesty.
Don't tell me that Pence will be better. NO. F******G WAY.
The GOP and their supporters are just plain old chickenpoop. No other word for it.
This is how they got Ashcroft out of the way to pave the way for Comey to name Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald got Scooter Libbey convicted of a process crime. Now Comey won't recommend prosecution for Hillary, but he sure will go after Trump. BULLSH!T.
Trump is going to get convicted of a process crime most likely. What a bunch of bravo sierra.
Sessions is chickenpoop, too. Ashcroft is chickenpoop. All of them are chickenpoop as far as I am concerned.
Trump?????
Again. Does this guy want to be President?
Maybe we were conned last year.
21:12
Mueller may look good on paper, but the circumstances surrounding this, and the virulence of the opposition , plus the indifference towards justice leads me to believe that justice will definitely not be served.
I am not at all assured. This is a disastrous decision. Nothing good is likely to come from it.
03:10 May 18:
Rosenstein appoints Mueller. But Rosenstein was the one who recommended Comey's firing.
How does Rosenstein have any credibility here?
Ramaswamy "goes nuclear"
Nobody seems to care about the truth. Going nuclear means telling the truth, or so it seems.
Okay, then let's drop 25 megaton truth bombs until all the deceit is wiped out.
Krispy Kreme was accused of lying by those commenting upon the video. It wouldn't be a surprise to me if there was a ton of that in this debate. They make themselves sound completely different from what they really are. Those who point it out aren't "very nice". That's an evasion. Dealing with the issues head-on is the only way it can be acceptable. Saying that something isn't very nice isn't denying the truth of the matter. Think about it.
Some observations and some thoughts
of the passing scene...
1. Nikki Haley DID say that she'd go to war over Crimea ( one of Ukraine's territorial claims). I'd have to review Ramaswamy's question again, but if memory serves, he asked what provinces that she was willing to FIGHT over. If she named Crimea, that's a BIG MISTAKE. Why? Possession is 9/10ths of ownership. Russia has important military bases in Crimea. Very important. So, if Nikki Haley is willing to put boots on the ground to free Crimea from Russia, then that means war with Russia. Pretty sure she'd back off of that one if she was confronted with it. But she probably wasn't asked, and even if she was, she also made a statement in that debate that she wouldn't respond anymore to Ramaswamy. She stepped into the doo-doo there, I'm sure.
2. With respect to the Islamic Jihad on Israel, if Biden and his ilk cared anything about international law, he would point out that the taking of civilian noncombatants cannot be in keeping with international law. Indeed, it is a war crime. If the government of Gaza supported it, then they too are guilty of war crimes. Indeed, this is worse than 9-11-2001, because there was no direct state involvement the 9-11 attacks, but there was here. That's why this is taking an ominous turn. The jihadist feel strong enough to attack directly on a state level. In the meantime, Biden props up Iran and the terrorists, and allows them free rein in the USA. Not only that, the Biden administration has made terrorists and their sympathizers a protected class.
Does it make much sense to negotiate with terrorists? This administration is not only doing that, but aiding and abetting it.
3. As for the GOP debate itself, although it is an improvement over allowing commies control over it, it cannot be said that it was in itself sufficient to make the entire thing worthwhile. The questioning was uninspired. If it were, some of these issues would have been discussed in more depth. If that were the case, the fact that Nikki Haley is defintely out of her depth, would have been much more obvious.
Update a little bit later...
Yes, he did mention fighting over Ukraine, and she did later say "Crimea". Listen carefully. The part about Haley mentioning Crimea was not in this video, but probably later in the debate. Note: I definitely heard her say Crimea.
1. Nikki Haley DID say that she'd go to war over Crimea ( one of Ukraine's territorial claims). I'd have to review Ramaswamy's question again, but if memory serves, he asked what provinces that she was willing to FIGHT over. If she named Crimea, that's a BIG MISTAKE. Why? Possession is 9/10ths of ownership. Russia has important military bases in Crimea. Very important. So, if Nikki Haley is willing to put boots on the ground to free Crimea from Russia, then that means war with Russia. Pretty sure she'd back off of that one if she was confronted with it. But she probably wasn't asked, and even if she was, she also made a statement in that debate that she wouldn't respond anymore to Ramaswamy. She stepped into the doo-doo there, I'm sure.
2. With respect to the Islamic Jihad on Israel, if Biden and his ilk cared anything about international law, he would point out that the taking of civilian noncombatants cannot be in keeping with international law. Indeed, it is a war crime. If the government of Gaza supported it, then they too are guilty of war crimes. Indeed, this is worse than 9-11-2001, because there was no direct state involvement the 9-11 attacks, but there was here. That's why this is taking an ominous turn. The jihadist feel strong enough to attack directly on a state level. In the meantime, Biden props up Iran and the terrorists, and allows them free rein in the USA. Not only that, the Biden administration has made terrorists and their sympathizers a protected class.
Does it make much sense to negotiate with terrorists? This administration is not only doing that, but aiding and abetting it.
3. As for the GOP debate itself, although it is an improvement over allowing commies control over it, it cannot be said that it was in itself sufficient to make the entire thing worthwhile. The questioning was uninspired. If it were, some of these issues would have been discussed in more depth. If that were the case, the fact that Nikki Haley is defintely out of her depth, would have been much more obvious.
Update a little bit later...
Yes, he did mention fighting over Ukraine, and she did later say "Crimea". Listen carefully. The part about Haley mentioning Crimea was not in this video, but probably later in the debate. Note: I definitely heard her say Crimea.
I made a bet that @NikkiHaley couldn’t even name just three regions of eastern Ukraine that she wants to send America’s sons & daughters to die fighting for. Turns out, I was right. pic.twitter.com/HvZRxsEpp0
— Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) December 7, 2023
Thursday, December 7, 2023
Nikki Haley had a bad night
Daily update (2):
I watched about 40 minutes of it. It seemed clear that she wasn't going to answer the question, nor was Christie. She did say Crimea, and maybe a couple other provinces. But she didn't do it so clearly so that it could be heard. All I heard was Crimea. Crimea was taken by Russia in 2014. The current USA involvement with military assistance didn't not happen then, but is happening eight years after that---Crimea shouldn't count. Maybe she really doesn't know. Maybe Christie really doesn't know either.
end update(2):
Daily update (1):
Chris Christie had a good night?
Here's a basic problem with the GOP right now. You've got Christie ripping Ramaswamy for "insulting" Nikki Haley's intelligence. At the link pointed above, some dude on Powerline seems to think that was a good line, plus a whole segment where Christie insults the MAGA wing.
Sorry, but Ramaswamy's question, about regions in Ukraine, is a fair question. Now I am curious as to whether or not she actually answered it. Christie's trying to link Ramaswamy to MAGA, by the way. While he's doing that, he's insulting MAGA Republicans. All the while, the MAGA Republicans are the majority of the party. This dude is evading the question. If she cannot answer the question, doesn't that make Ramaswamy's point? If she didn't, then isn't this just a Democrat like diversion? Let's all make it about personalities while claiming Donald Trump is a cult of personality.
It's all about dividing the party because they really do not want to win.
end update(1):
True, there was audible booing for Ramaswamy, but I think he made some valid points.
I don't know about the guy, but I don't know about any of them. For them to run against Trump is like someone who is in receipt of stolen goods. They stand to gain from the Democrat attempt to destroy Trump. To me, as long as the Democrats do that kind of thing, those who participate in these debates are being in support of destroying Trump.
None of the Democrats' accusations have any merit. The GOP should unite and quash it. They don't do that when they run against Trump. Besides, they seem to be running against each other. The winner of this cannot unite the party. They are already dividing the party even amongst themselves.
I watched about 40 minutes of it. It seemed clear that she wasn't going to answer the question, nor was Christie. She did say Crimea, and maybe a couple other provinces. But she didn't do it so clearly so that it could be heard. All I heard was Crimea. Crimea was taken by Russia in 2014. The current USA involvement with military assistance didn't not happen then, but is happening eight years after that---Crimea shouldn't count. Maybe she really doesn't know. Maybe Christie really doesn't know either.
end update(2):
Daily update (1):
Chris Christie had a good night?
Here's a basic problem with the GOP right now. You've got Christie ripping Ramaswamy for "insulting" Nikki Haley's intelligence. At the link pointed above, some dude on Powerline seems to think that was a good line, plus a whole segment where Christie insults the MAGA wing.
Sorry, but Ramaswamy's question, about regions in Ukraine, is a fair question. Now I am curious as to whether or not she actually answered it. Christie's trying to link Ramaswamy to MAGA, by the way. While he's doing that, he's insulting MAGA Republicans. All the while, the MAGA Republicans are the majority of the party. This dude is evading the question. If she cannot answer the question, doesn't that make Ramaswamy's point? If she didn't, then isn't this just a Democrat like diversion? Let's all make it about personalities while claiming Donald Trump is a cult of personality.
It's all about dividing the party because they really do not want to win.
end update(1):
True, there was audible booing for Ramaswamy, but I think he made some valid points.
I don't know about the guy, but I don't know about any of them. For them to run against Trump is like someone who is in receipt of stolen goods. They stand to gain from the Democrat attempt to destroy Trump. To me, as long as the Democrats do that kind of thing, those who participate in these debates are being in support of destroying Trump.
None of the Democrats' accusations have any merit. The GOP should unite and quash it. They don't do that when they run against Trump. Besides, they seem to be running against each other. The winner of this cannot unite the party. They are already dividing the party even amongst themselves.
Ramaswamy whips out a prop to take down Nikki Haley and the GOP debate erupts in boos https://t.co/H62yf1BOV3 via @BIZPACReview
— BootsandOil (@BootsandO6892) December 7, 2023
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)