A thought just occurred to me. It seems that the greater part of Democrat strategery is set up around the notion of grievance.
Somehow or another, the grievance scam is going to be played. The election of 2016 is a prime example. The idea here to make the election outcome, which brought Trump into the White House, as something of a grievance of some kind. Trump colluded with the Russians, blah, blah, blah. If it wasn't the Russians, it how unfair the Electoral College is, and all that. In other words, they have been wronged somehow. Hillary was denied the presidency, and it is just so unfair.
But there is no grievance. Hillary lost because she wasn't good enough.
I noted that this happened with the Trayvon Martin case, and some of the other cases like it. There was no grievance in those cases.
Today, I read that there was a grievance that supposedly involved some mistreatment of a homosexual. But tapes existed that showed nothing happened of the sort that the homosexual guy was claiming.
Reminds you of the Covington kids, does it not? There has to be some grievance for them to rally around. If there isn't one, then they make one up. They all rally around it and make a big deal out of it, but there is nothing there.
It isn't the first time.
Makes you wonder what they would do if nobody cared about their alleged grievances any more.
No comments:
Post a Comment