Saturday, September 14, 2024

Brokenism: A term I've never heard of before

Seen on Ace of Spades, HQ. It is contrasted with Status-Quoism.

Do you think things are broken, then you are of the Brokenism type. If you think we can muddle through, then you are the Status-Quo type.

As for yours truly, I think brokenism is what defines what a Christian is. We are all broken--we are sinners. When compared with the situation in our country, I think it may compare with the Fall of the Roman Empire in the West, AD 476 or so. Things are changing, but they always are. What's here today won't be here tomorrow. Certainly, the USA was a different place when I was a wee boy back in the sixties.

Especially with how I feel today. Not been a good day, physically.





J6th was a set up.

The video makes it look like it was set up so that she could bring charges. In other words, it was a set up. People need to remember that the riot was needed in order to bring the challenges to a close, and to end all possibilities of Trump being successful in that. The Supreme Court said the case had no standing, but if the challenges had been allowed to go through, maybe it would have, and we'd have had a different outcome on J6th.









Flash cards

Michelle Tafoya to Taylor not so Swift









Greatest fact-check evah











What about this Springfield Ohio story?

9/14/24; 3:08 PM

Cat Eaters of Ohio? Are they related to the Werewolves of London?





The Cat Eaters of Ohio by Christopher F. Rufo

The establishment media called it a racist myth, but is it?

Read on Substack




8:04 AM



Of course there's the debate reference again. Trump talks about them eating pets and animals in Springfield. So, armed with my Snopes thingie, I go to check that out. According to Snopes, the story is unfounded.

But something's going on there, isn't there? I recall seeing a story about reporters going there to check things out, and did a search on it. I found this Western Journal article here. So you can go there and see them talking about their stories.

Based upon just this much research, yes, there's definitely something going on there. Don't know about the pets and animals being eaten, but there's definitely a huge influx of immigrants into the place. Also, this is being driven primarily by federal policy.

The worst thing to me is that they'll try to win the election from these people being allowed to vote. It is plain and simple corruption at the very least.





Friday, September 13, 2024

There won't be another debate

9/13/24; 8:49 PM

Kamala Harris cannot possibly be serious about wanting another debate. She is in the BASEMENT. There hasn't been anything substantive that has come from her at all. The mis-called debate did nothing to change this.

She cannot expect Donald Trump to agree with her demands to do debates her way. In fact, there is little reason for Trump to debate her. If he's really behind, he'd want to. But he says no more debates. Would Trump agree to a debate according to his own preferences? Maybe. Otherwise, why? The only reason is if he behind in the polls. But if he was behind her, then WHY WOULD SHE want another debate?

The mis-called debate will not have a long shelf life even if she got a bounce, which she doesn't appear to have gotten. There will be lots of time to analyze the debate, and whatever benefit that might have accrued from a strong performance will be lost by election day. It may even sour on people. Indeed, this mis-called debate SHOULD sour on people. She's not hiding in the basement for nothing. She cannot possibly be serious.

9/11/24; 8:55 PM



She couldn't possibly be serious about another debate. It is only getting worse for her. She is better off in the basement!











More debate stuff





Kamala Harris did mention Charlottesville yet again. I'm not much into fact-checking, such as the one-sided "fact-checking" that went on in Tuesday's debate. Kamala's buddies failed to mention this had been debunked by Snopes. Snopes is well-regarded fact-checking site, so this should be laid to rest. No censorship required.

Meanwhile, some dude (not the actor) challenged the bias and really stepped into it.









New York Times gets something wrong?! The Devil you say? Yup, they got something wrong.