Maricopa County 2020 Election Audit Presentation on Video
Comment:
This is a 3 hour presentation and it won't be understood without paying close attention to it. Consequently, the initial leak of the results is going to be misleading. It is my opinion that the initial leak was intentional in that respect. One thing that comes out here is that the county's lack of cooperation hindered the final determination of truth regarding the results of the 2020 election in Maricopa County, Arizona.
That being said, there is plenty of evidence to support further investigation. This is what I'd call "probable cause". What you may have heard about probable cause in recent years was not probable cause of a crime. There is probable cause of a crime here in my opinion. As for actual proof of that crime, it is not quite there from what I've seen. In other words, those who are guilty will try to say that the results are in, and no further investigation is necessary. But there is evidence that a crime DID occur. Since it has taken so long to get to this point, we may never know it in time to make a difference.
That is what I've believed all along and this video confirms it. What the video shows, from my examination of it so far ( which isn't complete), is that there was plenty of opportunity for hanky-panky.
To "get under the hood", so to speak, will require a lot of explication. People are impatient, and rightly so. I know I was. Patience is what is needed here if you are going to get to the truth. There is sufficient evidence here to believe that the initial leak was misleading, and there will be continual pressure to stop drilling down to the truth of the matter.
An analogy might be useful here. So, I'll relate one from my own personal experience with my vehicle. All vehicles these days have a connection to which a diagnostic tool can be attached. This will give a code of some engine condition that needs attention. However, these do not always give you a code when something is clearly wrong. The device is computerized. The computer can't always diagnose the problem when there CLEARLY is one. In my own case, the vehicle was running poorly, but no code was being produced. The advice I got was to keep driving it. Eventually it ran so badly that it was undeniable that something was wrong, but the usual devices still weren't putting out a code. A MORE SOPHISTICATED diagnostic tool was brought in and found the problem. It was a bad coil pack. The thing was replaced, problem solved.
Another analogy from personal experience. I was experiencing pain. I got several X-Rays, but nothing was showing up. Finally, the doctors ordered an MRI. They found a cancer. The cancer was treated, and things got better. Problem is solved ( I hope). The point is that a MORE SOPHISTICATED analytical tool was needed to find the problem in both of these cases.
The way this is analogous is that there needs to be closer investigation of the results of the election, but we are constantly being told that nothing is wrong, but something is definitely wrong. This video shows that more investigation is needed, but what we are likely to be told is that nothing is wrong. If you go through this, which will take a lot of patience and TIME, you are likely to discover that there was indeed some things that need to be looked at more closely and CORRECTED. It was definitely not a clean election in that county. Too much wiggle room for hanky-panky.
I need to decide how much time I want to spend on this. The same is true for everybody else out there. I've already spent hours on it. Why hours? It is 3 hours long. Just to sit through something for 3 hours straight is not always possible. There are always other things that grab your attention. But just 3 hours on it isn't enough. If I wanted to report out my opinion of what was there, I'm going to have to go over it again and again. That can run into considerable amount of time.
This little essay of a few hundred words may give you an idea. You aren't going to get results here because it was necessary to add this intro before I actually got down to business. This thing could be discussed for quite some time. Be prepared to spend some time on it, if you are that interested. As for me, I have started doing some preliminary work on the thing, but it has taken a lot more than 3 hours so far. These things take time.
Update:
I have now completely watched it all. Here it is, half the way through Saturday, and I've been
spending all this time on this thing.
The most serious thing that I saw was with the networks. These had connections to the internet,
and that's a problem. ( putting that a bit too mildly)
There is not anything here that is conclusive proof of fraud. But there remains enormous room for
suspicion. Also, from the closing remarks, there doesn't appear to be much in the way of action to
be taken. There are PROMISES, but that and a few buckos may get you a cup of coffee.
The reason it took so much time is that I tried to set up a complete index of screenshots to take
a look at if I wanted to take the research further. Well, that's not for me to say, so it may have
been a waste of time to do all that.
It is primarily what I thought. Much ado about nothing. If there was to be anything, it would have
happened back in November of last year, and/or the time leading up to it.
All in all, even with the low expectations, it is a bit disappointing.
But the audit itself was okay. There was too much attention paid with the paper ballots. The real
meat of this was in the network anomalies, in which the presentation was eerily blanked out
at strategic times. Just a coincidence, I'm sure. /sarc
For those who expected much, there's not much here to tell you. Sorry.
After proofing this update, it is loaded with format errors. Blame that on this stupid blogger
interface. I typed it in instead of using a text editor offline.
As you can see, I'm a bit pissed.
