Friday, October 2, 2020

Why the recent debate won't change minds

 



So there was a post on Instapundit in which this latest hubbub about "white supremacy" was not condemned by Trump. Aside from whether or not he did or didn't, just exactly what did any white supremacist group do lately that can be condemned?

There's the rub. There isn't any, unless you count what hasn't be adjudicated yet. In fact, it is premature to condemn people who are presumed innocent until proven guilty. I am not aware of any guilty verdicts being handed down lately regarding any "white supremacist" groups. Not even any "white supremacist" individuals, as of yet.

But then the thought came that there hasn't been any convictions of Antifa groups or BLM violence as of yet either, but there are plenty of accusations. One thing is certain, of all the unrest lately, the fairy godmother didn't do it. SOMEBODY did. Nobody has seriously accused any "white supremacists" of that. At least not yet, although there seems to have been something that sounded like the devil made them do it, meaning Trump.

Anyway, the piece on Instapundit said that the left actually believes that only so-called white supremacists voted for Trump. If they get Trump to condemn the "white supremacists" then they will drive a wedge between Trump and his supporters. Wow. Now that really sounds pretty nutty to me. It might sound perfectly reasonable to your typical reporter.

But then it might sound pretty nutty on the other side that Trump was trying to drive a wedge between the Democrat groups. Maybe he was. I'm not so sure that that will work, if that is what he was attempting. He did say that in the debate that Biden lost the left. Well, maybe. I'm not so sure.

That's because if they can believe that the only reason somebody would vote for Trump is because they're a racist, then why would they vote for Trump? Maybe they stay home if they don't feel enthused for Biden. But then the idea is to gin up a lot of hatred for Trump because of his alleged sympathies for "white supremacy". Gotta get that boogey-man.

In other words, you have to believe that our number one trouble today is racism. Not the cities burning down. There may be people who think that way. At least those in the so-called profession known formerly as journalism. Chris Wallace seems to think so. And some others or so I've read.

They seem to be searching for that boogey-man. For them, Trump is it, and vice versa.

But SOMEBODY is burning down the cities. Where is that boogey-man? Maybe the fairy godmother did burn down the cities. Maybe it was just somebody's idea like Biden said.





Doctors: COVID-19 case counts, hospitalization numbers, and death counts are “meaningless”

Doctors: COVID-19 case counts, hospitalization numbers, and death counts are “meaningless”

Thursday, October 1, 2020

Researchers use membranes that remove salt from water to help 'split' sea water ...



Researchers use membranes that remove salt from water to help 'split' sea water into fuel


My comment: 

This could work if the claims are accurate.

Hydrogen ions are so small that they can pass through solid metal.   They could certainly pass through a membrane.  The larger ions that you want to contain stay behind because of this reverse osmosis membrane.   In other types of membranes, the chlorine ions pass through and cause problems.

It seems promising.  But there's no reason why nuclear power couldn't be the energy source.  These people are really hung up on this "renewable" energy talk.  There is no such thing as "renewable" energy.  Energy does not renew.

People who like to claim to be scientific need to learn some science.  Consequently, one should remain skeptical until they prove their claims.




About that debate

 



First thing, I didn't watch the debate. But I did read a lot of commentary on it, and it piqued my curiosity. So I downloaded the transcript.

Trump did okay. Biden did okay for him. All in all, I was left with the same impression that I had in the first place. It won't change my mind, and maybe no one else's either.

Bongino says Trump had a strategy. If so, it makes little difference to leftists. It might make a difference to some, though. I guess we'll see.

There might be some value in Trump's mentioning of things that the media censors.  Now that might be something.



Tuesday, September 29, 2020

Horowitz: The Civil War Started When Democrats Seceded From the Union in 2016 - Frontpagemag

Horowitz: The Civil War Started When Democrats Seceded From the Union in 2016 - Frontpagemag



comment:



What Horowitz describes is a coup, not a civil war.  But I've been saying that all along.




Media Aims For Scott Atlas Because He Keeps Exposing Coronavirus Lies

Media Aims For Scott Atlas Because He Keeps Exposing Coronavirus Lies: 'Everything he says is false,' NBC News quoted Redfield as saying of Scott Atlas. That's just not true, top epidemiologists told The Federalist.



comment:



Muck the Fedia.




Lanny Davis issues secession threat

 This one should end the way the first one did.

Besides, the only power that they have is in their cities.  The areas outside of the big cities are red.  If the blue "states" secede, how do they hold on to the red areas if they want to stay?

If war is chosen to keep them in line, it is going to get very ugly.


click to see source