Al Fin: "Cowboy Commentary", aka "Eat your veggies" The Flag banner is posted in order to defy those who would make patriotic symbols illegal or disreputable.
Tuesday, October 16, 2018
Stormy Daniels Parody
She seems to have lost a lawsuit lately. I got the idea to find the song called "stormy", and I found this parody song.
Not too bad.
Another reason for me thinking of this song is that it is raining up a storm out there. Flash floods are possible.
Monday, October 15, 2018
Elizabeth Warren really is Pocahontas
Cuz she says so. Bwah, hah, hah!
Anyway, there is no native American database of DNA, so she cannot prove a thing with her DNA test.
One thing that this might prove is that she's running for president in 2020.
The land of the Free and the Brave is turning into the Freak and the Fake.
Jeez.
Anyway, there is no native American database of DNA, so she cannot prove a thing with her DNA test.
One thing that this might prove is that she's running for president in 2020.
The land of the Free and the Brave is turning into the Freak and the Fake.
Jeez.
The blind spots
People have their blind spots. I know I have had mine. That is why I came up with the phrase "the truth is a slippery thing." When you are blind to the truth for whatever reason, you can miss it. It can be in plain sight, and you could still miss it.
When I read some "conservative" sites, I think I see the blind spots.
There are several of those spots here in this post on Betsy's Page. I stopped reading her blog in the recent past when she got too critical of Trump. Since I wanted new perspectives lately, I decided to give her blog another read.
Lo and behold, a number of blind spots seem to have been discovered by the lady. Although, she is not acknowledging the previous error in the way I think she should, she at least seems to be coming around to some slight understanding of the phenomenon.
There are several to mention here in this article. It is a rather long article.
Let me sum up the problem concisely. Some folks, like Betsy Newmark, cannot bring themselves to see that the Democrats are inveterate liars. There is a reason for that, and yet Betsy cannot seem to come to that conclusion that would enable her to understand why things are the way they are.
Perhaps she does understand, but is feigning ignorance. In that case, she is also a liar. My blind spot may be to give her the benefit of the doubt. At this point, at least, I don't think she is lying. But she had better get a clue soon. Time may be running out.
The possible reason that Kavanaugh's nomination succeeded is that the GOP's credibility was on the line. The reason they may be getting a clue is that patience with them may getting rather thin. They need to get on the ball. They almost let Kavanaugh's nomination fail just because they cannot stand up to the liberal's gimmickry.
I don't know if it is complicity or not, but if it continues, it cannot be distinguished very easily.
When I read some "conservative" sites, I think I see the blind spots.
There are several of those spots here in this post on Betsy's Page. I stopped reading her blog in the recent past when she got too critical of Trump. Since I wanted new perspectives lately, I decided to give her blog another read.
Lo and behold, a number of blind spots seem to have been discovered by the lady. Although, she is not acknowledging the previous error in the way I think she should, she at least seems to be coming around to some slight understanding of the phenomenon.
There are several to mention here in this article. It is a rather long article.
Let me sum up the problem concisely. Some folks, like Betsy Newmark, cannot bring themselves to see that the Democrats are inveterate liars. There is a reason for that, and yet Betsy cannot seem to come to that conclusion that would enable her to understand why things are the way they are.
Perhaps she does understand, but is feigning ignorance. In that case, she is also a liar. My blind spot may be to give her the benefit of the doubt. At this point, at least, I don't think she is lying. But she had better get a clue soon. Time may be running out.
The possible reason that Kavanaugh's nomination succeeded is that the GOP's credibility was on the line. The reason they may be getting a clue is that patience with them may getting rather thin. They need to get on the ball. They almost let Kavanaugh's nomination fail just because they cannot stand up to the liberal's gimmickry.
I don't know if it is complicity or not, but if it continues, it cannot be distinguished very easily.
Bigger a-hole rule
Must be bored, because I am reading a lefty site.
It is the Mahablog, the one I have written about before. This is where I got kicked off from commenting because I must have triggered the liberal lady there.
Maybe I didn't write about the story behind that, or maybe I did. Anyway, it was pretty tame stuff to be getting kicked off a blog for, but that's liberals for you. The reason I am bringing it up again is because I think their behavior is self-defeating. What happened with this incident with the Mahablog's action in my case may have been an excellent example of the bubble they live in. By insisting upon conformity to their point of view, without exception, they invoke the tendency towards group think.
So, the Mahablog writes up about a rule that she thinks the GOP violated in the Kavanaugh circus show. It is called the bigger asshole rule. She seems the GOP was acting like bigger assholes than what they were acting like. For one thing, she is admitting that the left acted like assholes. But, she doesn't seem to think that will hurt the Dems in the midterms, but the opposite. The biggest aholes are supposed to lose elections, the rule says.
For Barbara O'Brien to think that must mean that she is living in her own little bubble. Hard to say what the public will do, but she only accepts CNN's polling on the question, as opposed to other polls which state otherwise. In that way, I think she shows that she is in a bubble. The polls were wrong about Hillary in 2016. But then again, they don't want to accept that outcome either.
I am looking for other things to read, because this usual stuff is getting tiresome.
Reminds me of a joke. When someone asks you how you are doing, just say, "same shit, different asshole". There doesn't seem to be a shortage of assholes.
It is the Mahablog, the one I have written about before. This is where I got kicked off from commenting because I must have triggered the liberal lady there.
Maybe I didn't write about the story behind that, or maybe I did. Anyway, it was pretty tame stuff to be getting kicked off a blog for, but that's liberals for you. The reason I am bringing it up again is because I think their behavior is self-defeating. What happened with this incident with the Mahablog's action in my case may have been an excellent example of the bubble they live in. By insisting upon conformity to their point of view, without exception, they invoke the tendency towards group think.
So, the Mahablog writes up about a rule that she thinks the GOP violated in the Kavanaugh circus show. It is called the bigger asshole rule. She seems the GOP was acting like bigger assholes than what they were acting like. For one thing, she is admitting that the left acted like assholes. But, she doesn't seem to think that will hurt the Dems in the midterms, but the opposite. The biggest aholes are supposed to lose elections, the rule says.
For Barbara O'Brien to think that must mean that she is living in her own little bubble. Hard to say what the public will do, but she only accepts CNN's polling on the question, as opposed to other polls which state otherwise. In that way, I think she shows that she is in a bubble. The polls were wrong about Hillary in 2016. But then again, they don't want to accept that outcome either.
I am looking for other things to read, because this usual stuff is getting tiresome.
Reminds me of a joke. When someone asks you how you are doing, just say, "same shit, different asshole". There doesn't seem to be a shortage of assholes.
The Democrats cannot be serious
So much that is happening these days points to anarchy. Well, if there's one thing that the Democrats cannot have, and that is anarchy.
What the anarchy really means is that they have to be the ones to restore order. Oh, yeah. They create anarchy so that they can pose as the ones who have to clean it up. Yep. Sounds like a protection racket.
Look. Even Democrats cannot run a government that won't enforce any laws. Taxes have to be raised, order has to prevail. Big government cannot exist at the same time with anarchy. Anarchy is the opposite of big government.
It's the same with their threats of saying the Supreme Court isn't legitimate, so that they have to pack it with liberals. The Supreme Court is legit, or it isn't. Make up your minds, libs.
I think their anarchy routine isn't serious. You don't promote big government with anarchy, you do the opposite. If they are about anarchy, then they should rule as anarchists. But that isn't what you get with liberals.
They are not serious here.
What the anarchy really means is that they have to be the ones to restore order. Oh, yeah. They create anarchy so that they can pose as the ones who have to clean it up. Yep. Sounds like a protection racket.
Look. Even Democrats cannot run a government that won't enforce any laws. Taxes have to be raised, order has to prevail. Big government cannot exist at the same time with anarchy. Anarchy is the opposite of big government.
It's the same with their threats of saying the Supreme Court isn't legitimate, so that they have to pack it with liberals. The Supreme Court is legit, or it isn't. Make up your minds, libs.
I think their anarchy routine isn't serious. You don't promote big government with anarchy, you do the opposite. If they are about anarchy, then they should rule as anarchists. But that isn't what you get with liberals.
They are not serious here.
Sunday, October 14, 2018
I put a spell on you
Oh no! The witches are after us.
You know what? This could be serious. Barnhardt has some convincing evidence that the "Anti-pope" known as Francis is dabbling in witchcraft. Yep, he accepted a "Stang", which is a staff that "warlocks" are said to use. A couple gals gave it to him, and are pictured wearing some red wristband that also has witchcraft connotations.
You can make jokes about this, but it may not be a joke.
But it does put to the lie that Democrats are so level headed, tolerant, and scientific. But we have always known better. Or should have.
One Thousand Witches To Gather In New York City To Put A Hex On Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh On October 20th In Brooklyn https://t.co/4zPfR2kj59— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) October 14, 2018
You know what? This could be serious. Barnhardt has some convincing evidence that the "Anti-pope" known as Francis is dabbling in witchcraft. Yep, he accepted a "Stang", which is a staff that "warlocks" are said to use. A couple gals gave it to him, and are pictured wearing some red wristband that also has witchcraft connotations.
You can make jokes about this, but it may not be a joke.
But it does put to the lie that Democrats are so level headed, tolerant, and scientific. But we have always known better. Or should have.
Saturday, October 13, 2018
Obligatory, 10.13.18
Since this Kavanaugh business, posting has been real light.
What gives? I don't know. I really don't. There's really not a whole lot to say when the opposition goes as far as they are going now.
There's not much to say. You cannot argue with people who don't care anything about the truth. If the left insists on believing someone when there is no evidence, then that is game, set, and match as far as any discussion is concerned.
Why talk when talk is not going to change anybody's mind? At this point, it is a matter of who wins the contest. There's really nothing left to talk about.
Hillary says that the Dems will become more civil when they return to power. The fact is that they have never been civil, in or out of power. As long as the GOP was willing to be second bananas, the left is fine with that. It has the appearance of civility, but it is only because the GOP is submissive.
The Dems have all but admitted that they don't respect a two party system. For the GOP, the question is do you surrender or fight?
What gives? I don't know. I really don't. There's really not a whole lot to say when the opposition goes as far as they are going now.
There's not much to say. You cannot argue with people who don't care anything about the truth. If the left insists on believing someone when there is no evidence, then that is game, set, and match as far as any discussion is concerned.
Why talk when talk is not going to change anybody's mind? At this point, it is a matter of who wins the contest. There's really nothing left to talk about.
Hillary says that the Dems will become more civil when they return to power. The fact is that they have never been civil, in or out of power. As long as the GOP was willing to be second bananas, the left is fine with that. It has the appearance of civility, but it is only because the GOP is submissive.
The Dems have all but admitted that they don't respect a two party system. For the GOP, the question is do you surrender or fight?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)