Something familiar about all this...

Updated,

6.19.19:

Stone's defense is relying upon the predicate for the Russian collusion case, which would be the so-called hacked emails.

The government's position is "evidence" "what evidence"?  We don't need to show you any evidence!

Reminds of the way a gangster thinks.



6.16.19:

If Stone is successful with his defense, it will be devastating to the left.  That's because it will show them up for what they are---traitors.  However, he's going up against what will likely be a kangaroo court in a hopelessly corrupt jurisdiction.

Stone defense team exposes the 'intelligence community's' betrayal of their responsibilities https://t.co/CizsJ7hPFq

— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) June 16, 2019

6.15.19:

3:38 pm:

This has a Star Chamber quality about it.  We have a Separation of Powers doctrine that limits what each branch of government can do.  With respect to Stone, why was he even appearing before Congress?  Stone is a private citizen.  If he broke any laws, isn't that the duty of police and prosecutors to investigate?

The irony of all this is that eventually, Stone may be convicted of doing nothing but lie to Congress about doing what he has a right to do.  Of course, why would Stone lie about something that he has a right to do?  It doesn't matter much to me, the point is why is he even there to begin with?


12:35 pm:

Holy moly!  I just realized that Julian Assange could be called as a witness in this case.  It alleges in US v. Stone that Assange and Stone had contacts.  This case could very well involve the claim of hacked emails, so the source of the emails ( hack or leak ) is quite pertinent to the defense!


12:15 pm:

Useful tweet to show the background of what is happening.  Roger Stone's defense against an indictment, I suspect.

"Suspecting they could prove the Russian hacking claim was false, lawyers representing Roger Stone requested the full Crowdstrike report on the DNC hack"

Damn, this is coming from Roger Stone's very recent motion. Things starting to move quickly now I hope.

— Wyatt (@SayWhenLA) June 15, 2019

9:30 am:

Yes, the actual evidence shows that it was a leak, not a hack.  But the media ignores it, of course.

This little nugget........Totally disregarded and swept under the rug. https://t.co/4MvbVhYvEF

— KevinRearick (@KevinRearick) June 15, 2019

7:30 am:

Even worse than I thought.  It really is deja vu all over again.

DOJ Admits FBI Never Saw Crowdstrike Report on DNC Russian Hacking Claim... https://t.co/OIBVNOGe4Y via @thelastrefuge2

— Greg Meadows (@BootsandOilBlog) June 15, 2019

9.14.18:

It's like deja vu all over again.


Dianne Feinstein Sends Letter To FBI Accusing Brett Kavanaugh Of Nothing [VIDEO]


It's just like what they have been doing to Trump.  After two years of this Russian collusion business, they have no crime.

Manafort doesn't count because that was BEFORE Trump was even a candidate.

Pappa-dopp may have been set up over "stolen" emails that weren't even stolen.  The Crowdstrike finding was hearsay, but the FBI treated it as evidence.

Flynn didn't lie.  A confession was coerced.

Are we awake yet??