Sharyl Attkisson's Timeline of "Collusion against Trump"

It has a lot of info that is old news, but a few tidbits that were new to me.  Haven't finished it yet, though.

Note:  There is a tremendous amount of information in this timeline.  A lot of this has been in the news at one time or another.  Some of it may not have been.  It is not my intention to repeat old news here.  I am trying to add my take to this timeline, not to rehash old news.

• 
  

One tidbit was that the DNC computers were hacked in the year prior to the election.  This is well before Trump was nominated.  Indeed, this was before there were any debates or primaries.  A question not answered by the timeline is this:  since the DNC refused access to the FBI on the subsequent claim of hacking, did they also deny access on this alleged hacking?  If so, then why did they refuse on the second hacking?  If not, then why refer to the "hacking" as anything but a claim of hacking, not a proven attempt at hacking?  The subsequent hacking claim was said to have been verified by a DNC-paid-for gunslinger, and the FBI and CIA accepted this gunslinger's "evidence" as proof, when it is nothing more than hearsay.

• 
  

Another tidbit in the timeline was Anthony Weiner's computers having the emails on them.  This happened after Comey cleared Hillary, and these emails were not acted upon with any sense of urgency.  You can say that McCabe sat on them, and their existence wasn't made known to Comey for a month.  When it was, Comey re-opened the investigation, which was another sham investigation, and then closed it again while clearing Hillary once again.   Now the thing about this that should be questioned is whether or not these emails were seized, or were turned over voluntarily by Weiner's attorney.  Conservative Treehouse's Sundance says that the emails were turned in voluntarily.  This is in conflict with this timeline, which says it was seized.  Big difference.

• 
  

Here's something amusing:  a quote from Obama:

Oct. 18, 2016: President Obama advises Trump to “stop whining” after Trump tweeted the election could be rigged. “There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even — you could even rig America’s elections,” said Obama. 

The Democrats have been in "whining" mode for a lot longer time than the election lasted, and there is no evidence yet that they plan to stop whining about losing it.

• 
  

Another aside here:  there is a report out there that is an attempt to smear Trump again with a sexual charge.  I see a pattern.  This is a preemptive smear, which is an attempt to lessen the impact of an upcoming revelation against prominent Democrats.  I suspect that there may be some very bad stuff on those Anthony Weiner emails that were said to have been "seized", but may not have been actually "seized", but turned over by Weiner's attorney.  That stuff could include sexual deviancy by the Clintons.  Weiner may have turned over the emails as a kind of blackmail in order to get more lenient treatment for his sentencing, which had yet to be concluded as of that time.


Finally, I will stop reading this at this time.  I will update later, but there are other things to attend to.  This is taking a long time.

Update:

Nothing further to add.

The talk today is about a "mole" within the Trump campaign.  The big question going forward is what to do about this.