comment: Plenty more about the raid.
More commentary on the Bongino Show 8-11-22
As of this writing, I've seen about 75% of the show for today. Didn't see all of it.
The thing that caught my eye was that bit about these "confidential human sources" that the FBI is said to have used as a basis for this raid. Bongino called it a "spy". Language is important. I think some people will see that word, and pass over it thinking that it is just partisan sniping.
But there's no doubt that this is the same pattern as before. A confidential human source in Trump's household? Really? Who is it? The cleaning lady? Why would the cleaning lady know anything? It is quite relevant as to who this is. How do we know that it is actually a legitimate source?
Recently there was a kerfuffle in the J6th committee regarding something that Trump was alleged to have done. It turns out that this was hearsay. She didn't have first hand information of any kind. She wasn't even there. Yet the committee treating it so, so seriously. You know what? This is just speculation here, but I have a suspicion that the whole thing is made-up bravo-sierra. There isn't a "confidential human source". A confidential human source has to be someone who is in the position to know. Doubtful it could be someone in the household. Very doubtful.
The warrant is sealed, and it has been alleged that the lawyers weren't allowed a copy, and Trump may or may not have received it. That has been denied, in fact, by Trump's son Eric.
Finally, for this comment, Bongino mentions that the SECRET SERVICE secured the locker. Are they somehow accusing the SECRET SERVICE too? The fact that they looked all over the place for something must mean that they really didn't know where it was. Or whatever it was that they were looking for. Bongino notes that they have to swear an oath that a crime was committed in order to obtain a warrant. The group doing the raid seem to be obfuscating a few things for this to be considered on the up and up. If it is on the up and up, why shut down the security cameras? Why refuse to give a copy of the warrant, which is required? Why kick Trump's lawyers out?
Bongino cites the law that the liberals are salivating over. They have to show "willful" behavior. It would be hard to prove that in any court of law, which follows any reasonable basis for proof of facts. Perhaps they are counting on a biased jury to convict Trump of whatever they want to believe that he is accused of doing? I wouldn't trust these people further than I can throw Mount Everest. The voters in DC go 90 percent in favor of Democrats. You don't get these kind of numbers in anything but totalitarian states. Trump would NOT get a fair trial, nor any other Republican. You cannot convict anyone in that jurisdiction, if it is a Democrat, but you can convict anybody you want of anything you claim because there isn't any fair expectation of justice there in DC--especially political adversaries.
No comments:
Post a Comment